Error-Ref.com

You are here: Home / Search for "Ridge ring"

Search Results for: Ridge ring

Subsurface Corrosion

Part V. Planchet Errors:

Subsurface Corrosion

Definition: Corrosion that occurs beneath the surface due to the presence of contaminants that react with the surrounding metal.  Subsurface corrosion produces an expanding lens of spongy rot that forces up the overlying metal into various shapes.  These solid elevations can be round, oblong, or elongated.  If the roof ruptures, the exposed rot can fall out or collapse, leaving a crater.

Subsurface corrosion can occur in solid-metal coins, appearing most frequently in aluminum coins.

Subsurface corrosion occurs even more frequently in plated coins, when contaminants get trapped between the plating and the core.  For example, in copper-plated zinc cents, domes of solid rot will push up the overlying copper plating.  These domes can resemble plating blisters, but their etiology is entirely different.  Plating blisters are hollow and are produced by expanding gas in the immediate aftermath of the strike.

Although subsurface corrosion is technically a planchet error, it is undesirable and has no value.

SKorea_1won_corrosion_ridge_obvcorrosion_ridge_close

This solid-aluminum 1969 South Korea 1 won shows the effects of subsurface corrosion on its obverse face.  A long, thin ridge is the dominant feature.  Although it resembles a die crack, the fact that the design continues across it shows that this is not the case.  Accessory patches of corrosion are found elsewhere on the obverse.  Some of the smaller pimples have ruptured, exposing pale, milky rot.

Filled Collar / Obstructed Collar

Part VI. Striking Errors:

Struck-Through Errors:

Filled Collar / Obstructed Collar

Definition: It’s very seldom that a collar will accumulate dirt or debris, as it’s largely self-scouring.  Each time a newly-struck coin is ejected, it tends to carry with it anything that might have settled against the working face of the collar.  Nevertheless, once in a great while material will remain behind, lodged against the collar.

 As you might expect, reeded issues are the only ones in which this error type is known.  The grooves in the working face of the collar are more likely to accumulate foreign matter than are the smooth collars used for cents and nickels.

If the foreign matter rises no higher than the ridges on the working face of the collar, the edge of the affected coin will lack reeding for several arc degrees.  This portion of the edge won’t extend out as far as the normal, reeded edge.

If the foreign matter extends past the ridges on the working face of the collar, then this material will stand in the way of any planchet forced down upon it by the impact of the hammer die.  This collision will push coin metal upward from the edge and prolong it into a vertical flange.  The opposite face will show distortion of the rim in the form of a rounded shoulder.

03a_obstructed_collar_shoulder_1999_10c_Canada 03b_obstructed_collar_flange_1999_10c_Canada 03c_obstructed_collar_edge_1999_10c_Canada

At the moment, obstructed collar errors are known only from a few Canadian specimens.  Here we see the affected portion of a 1999 Canadian dime struck within an obstructed collar.  Coin metal has been scraped from the edge and forced into a vertical flange that is triangular in shape.  The corresponding area on the obverse face (struck by the anvil die) lacks the design rim and instead shows a rounded shoulder

 

MD-12

Machine parts above collar can impede expanding

coins

By Mike Diamond | May 21, 2011 10:00 a.m.
Article first published in 2011-05-30, Expert Advice section of Coin World

51863654

 

An off-center cent with a “sideneck strike.” Driven toward the northeast by the expanding die-struck portion of the coin, the unstruck edge collided with the side of the adjacent hammer die neck.

Images by Mike Diamond.

As a coin is struck, its expansion is abruptly halted by the surrounding collar.

When the collar fails to deploy, a coin expands in all directions. As a result, all off-center strikes and broadstrikes are wider than a normal coin, to varying degrees.

On some occasions a coin’s expansion is impeded, and the edge damaged, by machine parts positioned above the collar plate.

The most familiar obstacle to unfettered expansion is the neck of an adjacent hammer die. In a dual or quad Bliss press (the last of which was retired in 2005), the close proximity of adjacent die pairs results in the occasional production of a “sideneck strike,” also referred to as an “almost saddle strike” or a “one-die saddle strike.”

A typical example is shown here in an off-center Lincoln cent. At the pole opposite the 1 o’clock position of the obverse face, we see a deep, concave notch and an associated pressure ridge. The planchet represented by this coin lay partly within one striking chamber and almost managed to encroach on the adjacent striking chamber. In other words, the coin fell just short of becoming a “saddle strike.” When struck, the expanding die-struck area pushed the unstruck portion toward the adjacent striking chamber. It collided with the side of the hammer (obverse) die neck as the latter was striking its own coin.

Sideneck strikes are always concave and always closest to the adjacent striking chamber. In most years, this chamber would lie along a line drawn from the 1 o’clock position in Lincoln cents, or the 11 o’clock position in Jefferson 5-cent coins and Roosevelt dimes.

Strike-related edge damage of another kind is seen in an undated Jefferson 5-cent coin. The pole opposite the off-center strike has a flat, vertically oriented contact facet. It appears that the facet was produced when the unstruck portion of the planchet was pushed south by the expanding die-struck area and collided with a machine part. Another possibility is that the coin was hit while momentarily immobilized by the two dies.

In either case, we can’t be sure what machine part was responsible, although I suspect a feeder finger. I’ve encountered these flat facets on quite a few off-center and double-struck cents and 5-cent coins. In each case, the strike is about 70 percent off-center and the contact facet lies opposite the base of the bust.

The introduction of the Schuler press introduced new types of strike-related edge damage. This press uses a single die pair, with the reverse die operating as the hammer die. The damage is primarily associated with multi-struck coins. A representative example is provided by a quadruple-struck 5-cent coin. The first strike was normal. The other strikes were delivered about 20 percent off-center and are closely spaced. Edge damage is present on both the right and left sides. The contact facet on the right side is convex, slightly beveled, and extends from 12 o’clock to 2:30.

The dies evidently struck whatever machine part rested against the coin. On the left side the coin buckled when it collided with a hard object. The contact facet here is quite compact and lies next to the w of we. It’s possible that the coin was pushed laterally into an obstruction by expansion produced by the off-center strikes. It’s also possible that an object hit the coin as the latter was temporarily immobilized between the dies.

This type of edge damage can be found on numerous multi-struck cents, 5-cent coins, and Washington quarter dollars struck by Schuler presses. The pattern is consistent, although the long facet and the short facet can be located on either the right or the left side.

The affected coins all show a sequence of strikes involving a normal (or at least centered) first strike, and one or more closely spaced off-center strikes. Coins in which the off-center strikes are widely spaced or erratically positioned typically do not show this edge damage. The long facet that hugs the edge of the off-center strikes is almost certainly caused by contact with a feeder finger. I’m not sure about the short facet.

Coin World’s Collectors’ Clearinghouse department does not accept coins or other items for examination without prior permission from News Editor William T. Gibbs. Materials sent to Clearinghouse without prior permission will be returned unexamined. Please address all Clearinghouse inquiries to cweditor@coinworld.com or to (800) 673-8311, Ext. 172

http://www.coinworld.com/articles/machine-parts-above-collar-can-impede-expandi/

Copyright 2012 by Amos Hobby Publishing Inc. Reposted by permission from the March 22, 2012, issue of Coin World.)

 

Wide Collar

Part IV. Die Errors:

Collar Manufacturing Errors:

Wide Collar

Definition:  A coin struck inside a collar whose diameter is wider than normal.  This rare error is subtle and is often only detected when an otherwise normal-looking coin gets stuck in a plastic storage tube or won’t fit in its designated hole inside a cardboard Dansco album.

An abnormally wide collar can arise in several ways:

1. A collar intended for a different (perhaps foreign) denomination is inadvertently installed in a press.
2. A smooth-faced collar is mistakenly machined too wide.
3. A reeded collar is widened beyond normal tolerances through the use of an incorrect ridged broach that is
hammered into the collar opening.
4. A normal collar is not replaced in a timely manner and widens due to prolonged use.
5. The presence of three or more vertical collar cracks allows the collar to expand.The last two circumstances are probably the most common causes of this error.


This 1918 cent was struck in a collar that expanded due to the presence of four vertical collar cracks.  Its diameter
measures 19.45 mm instead of the normal 19.05 mm.

The above 1999-P dime was struck in an abnormally wide collar. The diameter of this dime measures 18.24 mm instead of the normal 17.91 mm.  It’s likely that the collar expanded due to the relentless pounding involved in restraining hundreds of thousands of planchets.  The edge is slightly convex in vertical cross-section, which is consistent with this scenario.  This dime also shows a case of surface film transfer on the obverse face.  This type of error occurs when the preceding coin is double struck with movement between strikes.  If either the coin or the die is grimy, a shadow image of the first strike is transferred to the die face and then transferred back to the next planchet.

For more information on wide collar errors see the May 17, 2010 Coin World.

Slide Doubling

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Machine Doubling:

Slide Doubling

Definition:  In this form of doubling, a die drags itself through the newly-struck design, smearing the features.  Strong cases of slide doubling are always restricted to the face struck by the hammer die.  After reaching the lowest point of its downstroke, the hammer die shifts to one side without bouncing.  As it drags itself across the newly-struck design, it piles coin metal into a series of ridges.  Weak cases of slide doubling found on the reverse face have previously been assigned to “ejection doubling”, but there is no way to prove that this is actually what happened.

Forms of machine doubling combining elements of both push doubling and slide doubling do occur.

A very severe case of slide doubling is seen on this 2001-D cent.  As is often the case, it is accompanied by a design ablation error.  The hammer die first contacted the coin in a centered position.  As it sank down into the planchet, the hammer die shifted to the northeast, erasing the newly-struck design in a crescentic area in the southwest.  Having completed its downstroke in a misaligned position, the hammer die then shifted back toward the southwest, dragging itself through the newly-struck design.  The design is grotesquely smeared as a result.

On the two examples (Kennedy half and Washington quarter) the green arrow indicates the direction the die traveled as contact was made (Die Ablation), with the white arrow showing the scraped planchet face. The red arrows show both the direction the die took as it returned and also shows the areas where the metal was moved and piled up. The light green arrows show details of the Slide Doubling on the Kennedy half.

Rockwell Test Mark In Planchet

Part V: Planchet Errors:

Pre-strike Damage:

Rockwell test mark in planchet


Definition:
A Rockwell hardness tester is used to measure the hardness of metals in the U.S. Mint. It measures the depth of penetration of a steel or diamond-tipped pin relative to the applied force.

When applied to a planchet, the Rockwell test mark will appear as a small circular pit with a smooth floor.  Such planchets are supposed to be discarded. If a planchet with a Rockwell test mark is struck by coinage dies, the pit is not erased. The pit’s original circular outline may, however, be distorted into a slight oval as the coin expands beneath the impact of the dies.

Depicted below is a 1971-S cent with a Rockwell test mark on the reverse face, above and to the right of Lincoln’s statue. This coin falls in with expectations derived from sparse written sources.

This particular example was authenticated by “Lonesome” John Devine and is convincing. The floor of the cup-shaped depression is completely smooth, as would be expected of a dimple produced by a pin tipped by a small steel ball. Although there is no metal flow in the design bordering the crater, there is also no trace of a pressure ridge, indicating that the defect was present before the strike. The pit is oval, rather than circular, but this can be attributed to distortion produced by the strike.

All alleged Rockwell test marks in planchets are now considered suspect, including the 1971-S cent described above.

This pit has a smooth floor and oval shape. It was long assumed that the originally circular outline was altered by the strike, but I now see this as unlikely. First of all, the pit is near the center of the coin, where converging lines of radial tensile stress meet and where radial expansion would have been limited. Second, the pit’s long axis is oriented north-south, instead of oriented toward 12:15. Third, the pit’s long axis overlies and is aligned with a Memorial column. Coin metal rising into a column recess would also have flowed toward the pit, shrinking the circle’s north-south diameter.

This pit, and others like it, may represent the impressions of spherical pellets that fell onto the coin metal strip and were stretched out during rolling. They also might be the impressions of oblong objects that were struck into the coins and then fell out.

Rockwell1971Scent

Machine Doubling

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Machine Doubling

Definition: This form of doubling typically results from vibration or instability affecting the die, die assembly, or press frame.  It has also occasionally been blamed on a coin sticking to the anvil die during ejection (“ejection doubling”).

Machine doubling has many synonyms: mechanical doubling, machine doubling damage, machine damage doubling, ejection doubling, shift doubling, and strike doubling.

.
There are three basic forms of machine doubling:

Push doubling:  Push doubling occurs when a die bounces off the surface of the coin, shifts position, and lands lightly in a different spot.  A diagnostic feature is marginal shelving at the edges of design elements.  Interior features often show rounded doubling that is easily mistaken for the effects of a double strike or a doubled die.  Push doubling can occur on either face, although its most dramatic expressions tend to appear on the face struck by the hammer die.  Cases of push doubling can involve up to three closely-spaced sets of accessory design elements.  Push doubling can occur on both faces simultaneously and often in different directions.  Up to three different doubling directions can be represented on a single face.

Slide doubling:  In this form of doubling, a die drags itself through the newly-struck design, smearing the features.  Strong cases of slide doubling are always restricted to the face struck by the hammer die.  After reaching the lowest point of its downstroke, the hammer die shifts to one side without bouncing.  As it drags itself across the newly-struck design, it piles coin metal into a series of ridges.  Weak cases of slide doubling found on the reverse face have previously been assigned to “ejection doubling”, but there is no way to prove that this is actually what happened.

Rim-restricted design duplication: This rare form of doubling has to date only been detected on Presidential dollars (Washington to Madison), 1994 cents (several die pairs), a 2004 cent, and certain quarters and dimes where the peripheral letters hug a very narrow design rim.  It always occurs on the face struck by the hammer die.  After reaching the lowest point of its downstroke, the hammer die bounces up, shifts to one side, and lands lightly on the design rim, leaving a set of raised design elements.  It is also sometimes referred to as “one-sided, rim-restricted design duplication”.

The images below show “Push” machine doubling.

Index Of Completed Entries

Index entries are a mixture of higher-level and lower-level entries.  Lower-level entries are often inserted into the index in alphabetical order and may therefore be separated from the higher-level entry they fall under in the Checklist.

A

Abrasion Doubling

Absent Edge Lettering

Abnormally Strong Strike: Due to Stacked Coins or Planchets

Abnormally Strong Strike: Extremely large Broadstrike

Abnormal reeding: Low, Narrow Reeds

Abnormal Upset

Accidental Die Abrasion

Acid Jobs

All Clad or Coreless Coins 

Alloy Errors: Intrinsic metallic inclusions

Annealing Error: Improper Annealing

Anvil Die Collar Clash

Arcing Rim-to-rim Die Crack

Assay Clips

Assay Value Repunched 

Asymmetrical: Split die

 B

Bilateral, Radial, Antipodal Die Breaks

Bilateral Split Collar

Bi-level Die Cracks

Bi-metallic coin 1993, 50 Roubles; temporal/transitional mule

Bi-metallic coin with Doubled Punched Center Hole

Bi-metallic coin with Incomplete Trilaminar Core

Bi-metallic coin with Misaligned Center Hole

Bi-metallic coin with Misaligned Core

Bi-metallic coin with Ring Accidentally Punched from Solid Metal coin

Bi-metallic coin with Ring Incomplete Punch

Bi-metallic coin with Struck Core

Bi-metallic coin with Struck Core from Another Country

Bi-metallic coin with Struck Outer Rings

Bi-metallic coin with Wrong Core Inserted

Bi-metallic design struck on wrong bi-metallic planchet

Bi-metallic planchet Struck by Solid Denomination Design

Bi Metallic Ring Struck with dies From the Wrong Country

Bi-metallic Solid Denomination Planchet Struck by Bi-metallic Dies

Blakesley Effect

Blank

Blanking and Cutting Errors

Blanking Burr

Blanking Press

Blistered Plating

Blunder Date

“Blow Hole”; Ragged Perforation in Planchet

Bonded Coins

Bonding Mill

Bowtie Clips 

Brassy Plating

Broadstrike: Centered

Broadstrike: Cupped

Broadstrike: Forced

Broadstrike: Uncentered

Brockage: Aligned Partial Brockages

Brockage-counterbrockage Combination

Brockage: Full

Brockage: Partial

Brockage: From Large Dropped Filling

Brockage: From Struck Die Fill

Broken Hub

Broken Punch

“Buffalo” Nickel, 1913; Type I and Type II

Business Strike on a Proof Planchet

C

Canadian “Assisted” Error Coins

Canceled and Waffled Coins

Capped Die Doubling; Incused

Capped Die Doubling, Raised

Capped Die Strike: Struck Through a Late Stage Die Cap

Catastrophic Collar Failure

Catastrophic Die Damage

Catastrophic Die Failure 

Chain Strike

Chatter Clash

“Cheerios” Dollar; 2000-P Sacagawea Dollar Coin

Chinese Fabricated Error coins

Chipped Collar

Circumferential Cuds

Clad Planchet

Clash: Counter Type I

Clash: Counter Type II 

Clashed Cap Strike

Clash Marks

Clash Marks: Multiple

Clashed Dies

Clashed Dies: 2000P “Superclash” nickel

Clip diagnostics (see Blanking and Cutting errors)

Clip: Assay

Clip: Bowtie

Clip: Corner

Clip: Curved

Clip: Elliptical

Clip: Incomplete punch (see Incomplete punch)

Clip: Multiple clips and combination clips

Clip: Ragged

Clip: Straight

Coin Struck on Planchet Fragment

Coin struck on washers, gears, and other hardware

Collar Cuds: Bilateral split collar

Collar Cuds: Complete collar break

Collar Cuds: Chipped collar

Collar Cuds: Irregular collar break

Collar Cuds: Retained collar cud

Collar Cuds:  Rotating collar cud

Collar Cuds: Vertical collar crack

Collar Damage

Collar: Wide 

Collar Shimmy

Compound Misalignment: Horizontal and Rotated 

Compound Misalignment: Horizontally / Vertically

Concentric Lathe Marks

Conceptual Design Flaw: Inaccurate Design

Conceptual Design Flaw: Misspelling

Connected to die crack or split

Convexo – Concavo Dies

Copper foil: Retained Struck Through

Coreless or All Clad Coins

Counterbrockages 

Counterbrockages: Rebound

Counterclash Type I

Counterclash Type II

Counterfeit Dies

Counterfeit Second Strike “Non Error”

Cracked Planchet

Cracked and Peeling Plating

Crazed Die

Crenellated Rim

Crescent Curved Clips

Cud

Cud: Circumferential

Cud: Crescentic Cud

Cud: Elongate

Cud: Irregular

Cud: Ovid

Cud: Progression on 1863 Token

Cud: Retained on the Anvil Die

Cud: Rim

Cupped Off-center Strike

Curved clips 

Curvilinear Blanking Burr

Cutting Burr

D

Date: Misplaced

Deeply-punched mintmark  

Defective Punch

Deformed Collar

Delayed Second Strike

Design/Composition Mismatches

Design Ablation Errors

Detail-Erasing Die Wear

Design Berms

Design Creep 

Design Decapitation Error

Design-Devouring Die Wear

Design Error: 1828 Half Cent with 12 Stars

Design Extension Dimples

Design Hub Doubling

Design Modification; 1797 dime with either 13 or 16 stars

Die Alignment Errors: Forced Misalignments

Die Attrition Error

Die Break

Die Break Caused by Impact

Die Cap: Obverse

Die Cap: Partial off-center

Die Cap: Reverse

Die Cap: Shifted Strike

Die Chip

Die Clash

Die Clash: Floating

Die Clash: Horizontal Misalignment

Die Clash: Radically Misaligned

Die Clash: Rotated

Die Clash: Vertical Misalignment

Die Crack: Die Crazing

Die Crack: Arcing rim-to-rim die crack

Die Crack: Rim to Rim

Die Crack: Bi-level die cracks

Die Crack: Impact-Induced Die Cracks

Die Crazing

Die Damage: Die Dent

Die Damage: Die Scrapes

Die Damage: Die Rings (Tiny Rings, Semicircles, Crescents, And Spirals)

Die Damage: Peripheral die damage

Die Damage: Die attrition errors

Die Dent

Die Deterioration/deformation: Die subsidence

Die Deterioration/deformation: Die deterioration doubling

Die Deterioration/deformation: Incused Doubling 

Die Deterioration/deformation: Raised Doubling

Die Deterioration/deformation: Well-defined rings on Euro coins

Die Deterioration/deformation: Reciprocally deformed, convexo-concavo dies

Die Deterioration; Parallel Flow Lines

Die Exfoliation Errors

Die Gouges

Die Rings (Tiny Rings, Semicircles, Crescents, And Spirals)

Die Scrapes

Die Subsidence 

Different Denomination: Dual Country

Different Mintmark Styles

Different Placement of Mintmarks Within the Same Year

Distended Hub Doubling

Distorted Hub Doubling

Division Lines

Domestic Struck on Foreign Planchet

Double Denomination; Same year

Double Die

Doubled Dies

Doubling: Abrasion

Doubling: Master Die 

Doubling: Reduction Lathe

Draped Bust dime 1804; with 14 stars on the reverse

Dryer Coins “Non Error”

Dual Denomination; Different Years 

Dual Denomination: Same Year

Dual Mintmark 

Dual Misalignment of both dies (hammer and Anvil)

E

Earliest Inverted Die Setup

Early, mid and late-stage counterbrockages

Edge Lettering: Absent 

Edge Lettering: Lettering Die Inclusion

Edge Lettering; Two Sets

Edge Strikes

Edge Strike: with Off-center or Broad Strike

Ejection Doubling

Ejection Impact Doubling

Elliptical clips

Elliptical Strike Clips 

Elongate Cud

Embedded Matter: Lettering Die Inclusion

Embedded Matter Struck In

Encircling Pressure Bumps

Exogenous Floating Die Clash

Expansion Ripples

Experimental Bath and / or Rinse

External Disc Impressions

External Struck-through Errors (with Cupping)

Extrusion strikes: With indents and partial brockages

F

Fabricated Error Coins: Chinese

Feeder Finger 

Feeder/Ejector Scrapes 

Filled Collar / Obstructed Collar 

Field-Restricted Struck-Through Errors

Finning

Fissure – Ragged & Smooth

Flan

Flat Field Doubling

Floating Collar Clash

Floating Die Clash

Foldover Strikes 

Foldover Strike: Axial Fold 

Foldover Strike: Double or Z-fold

Foldover Strike: Outward Fold 

Foldover Strike: Paraxial

Forced Broadstrike

Foreign Denomination struck on a U.S. Planchet

Foreign Object Chain Strike

Freestanding Interior: internal die breaks

Full Indent 

Full Uniface Strike

G

Gang Punch

“Garage Job”

Gas Bubbles

“Ghost” Images

Ghost Images Formed by Grease

Grease-Generated Counterbrockage

Grease-mediated radial-smear

Grease-Mold Doubling

H

Heavy Die Scratching

Hidden Initials And Symbols

Horizontal Mint mark 

Horizontal Misalignment of the Hammer Die

Hub Doubling

Hubbed-In Debris

I

Illicitly Applied Die Impressions

Improper Annealing

Improper Alloy Mix

Inaccurate Design: Conceptual Design Flaw

Incomplete Plating

Incomplete Proof Laser Frosting

Incomplete Punch 

Incuse Machine Doubling

Indented by a Smaller Planchet

Indent; Full

Indent; Partial

Inside Corner clip (see Assay Clip)

Intentional and Assisted Mint Made Errors

Interior Die Break Connected to a Die Crack or Split

Interstrike Damage

Intra-strike Damage

Inverted Die Installation

Inverted Hump

Inverted Mintmark

Invisible strike

Irregular Planchet: Heavier than Normal Coin of the Same Denomination

Irregular Planchet: Scrap Metal, Feeder Finger Material

Irregular Planchet: Scrap Metal, Off-metal

Irregular shaped Cuds

Isolated Machine Doubling

J

Janvier Reduction Lathe

Jefferson Nickel, 1942; with and without mintmark

L

Lamination Error: Cracks

Lamination Error: Loss After Strike

Lamination Error: Loss Before Strike

Lamination Fold-over Before Strike

Lamination in Clad Coins

Lamination: Retained

Large Cent with 15 stars on the obverse; 1817

Large Over Small Mintmarks

Large and Small mint mark variations used in the same year

Late-stage Brockages

Liberty Head Nickel, 1883; with and without the word CENTS.

Lincoln cent, 1909; with and without designer’s initials (V.D.B.)

Longacre’s Doubling

Loss of Design Elements Due to Abrasion

M

Machine Doubling

Machine Doubling: Incused

Machine doubling in more than one direction

Machine Doubling: Isolated

Machine doubling on both faces of same coin

Machine Doubling: Push Doubling

Machine Doubling: Slide Doubling

Machine Part Impingement

Malaysian “assisted errors” 2005-2007

Malrotation Errors

Master Die Doubling

Mated Pair

Median (bisecting): Split die

Mid-stage Brockages

Mintmark Variety: Different Styles

Mintmark Variety: Dual

Mintmark Variety: Horizontal

Mintmark Variety: Inverted

Mintmark Variety: Large over Small

Mintmark Variety: Misplaced

Mintmark Variety: Omitted

Mintmark Variety :Over Mintmark

Mintmark Variety: Phantom

Mintmark Variety: Repunched

Mintmark: Variety Tilted

“Mirror” Brockages

Misaligned Collar Clash

Misaligned Hubbing (Uncorrected)

Mismatched business / proof dies: 1999 $5 and $10 gold eagles W-mintmark

Misplaced Date

Misplaced Mint mark 

Missing Clad Layer: After strike

Missing Clad Layer; Absent Before Rolling is Completed; Full

Missing Clad Layer: Before strike

Missing Clad Layer: Both

Missing Clad Layer; Partial

Misspelled: Conceptual Design Flaw

Misspelling on Working Dies

Modified Hub Doubling

Mule: 1959D Lincoln Cent

Mule Clash

Mule Clash: 1857 FEC / 1857 SLQ

Mule Clash: 1857 FEC / 1857 SLH

Mule Clash: 1857 FEC / $20.00 Gold

Mule Clash: 1864 2c reverse die clashed with Indian cent obverse die

Mule: Coin Die Matched with Private Token Die

Mule: Collar mules

Mule: Involving Pattern Dies

Mule: Mule die larger than normal die and collar)

Mule: Pseudo-mules

Mule: Regular-issued die muled with commemorative die

Mule: Regular-issue die muled with government medal or token die)

Mule: Temporal – 2000 Macedonia 1 Denar

Mule: Temporal – 2008 Silver Eagle w/ 2007 Reverse

Mule: Temporal/Transitional Bi-metallic 50 Roubles

Mule: Two different countries

Mule: Two anvil dies

Mule: Two hammer dies

Mule: Washing Quarter / Sacagawea Dollar

Mule: Wrong anvil die

Mule: Wrong hammer die

Mule: Wrong hammer and anvil die

Mule: Wrong anvil die – 1993-D and 1999 cent dime mules

Mule: Wrong hammer die – 1995 cent/dime mule

Multiple Clash Marks

Multiple clips and combination clips

Multiple Counterbrockages

Multiple Misaligned Strikes

Multiple strikes: Flipover

Multiple strikes: In-collar/out–of-collar

Multiple strikes: On-center/Off–center

N

Near Date; Susan B. Anthony 1979-P dollar

No Mintmark

Notching

Number of Stars on the Obverse of the U. S. Dime, Half Dollar and Dollar; 1796 to 1799 

Numerous Closely Spaced Strikes

O

Obstructed Collar / Filled Collar

Obverse Die Cap

Off Center Strike Uniface Strikes

Off Center Strike with Collar Scar

Off Metal: Domestic

Off Metal: Unidentified Origin & Purpose (Orphan)

Off-metal/Wrong planchet Error: Design struck on larger planchet or coin

Offset Hub Doubling

Omitted Design Elements on a Working Die

Omitted Mintmarks

Orange Peel Texture

Other Forms of Doubling

Outthrust Die Fragments

Over Date: Caused by Reengraving or Repunching

Over Date: Caused by Second Hubbing

Over Mintmark

P

Partial Collar

Partial (off-center) Die Cap

Partial Indent

Phantom Mint mark

Pine Cone (bonded coins)

Peripheral Die Damage

Peripheral Die Expansion and Erosion

Peripheral Doubling

Pile-ups

Pivoted Die Error

Pivoted Hub Doubling

Planchet

Plated Coins: Intentional/Assisted Error

Plating Disturbance Doubling

Plating Error: Thick plating

Pre-cud die crack (see Arcing rim-to-rim die crack)

Pre-strike Damage

Pre-strike Damage: Rockwell Test Mark in planchet

Pristine Planchets

Progressive Indirect Design Transfer on Dimes

Progressive Indirect Design Transfer on Foreign Coins

Progressive Indirect Design Transfer on Lincoln Cents

Proof Finish: Frosting in Wrong Place

Proof Finish; Offset Frosting

Proof Finish, Frosting Slop-over

Proof Strike on a Business Planchet

Push Doubling (Machine Doubling)

R

Radial Flow Lines

Radically Misaligned Die Clash

Ragged clips

Ragged Perforations on a Planchet; “Blow Hole” 

Raised Clash Marks

Rebound Counterbrockages

Reciprocally Deformed Dies

Recurring die subsidence error

Reduction Lathe Doubling

Reeding: Abnormal

Re-engraved Denomination

Re-engraved Designer’s Initials on a 1944-D Half Dollar

Re-punched Date

Re-punched Denomination

Re-punched Design Elements

Re-punched Letters

Re-punched Mintmark

Re-punched Mintmark with Two Different Fonts

Retained Collar Cud

Retained Cud: on the Anvil Die

Retained Cud: on the Hammer Die

Retained Cud: Protrudes Beyond Die Face

Retained Cuds: with horizontal offset

Retained Cuds: with vertical displacement

Retained Interior Die Breaks

Retained Interior Die Breaks: Connected to die crack or split

Retained Interior Die Breaks: Freestanding

Retained Lamination

Retained Struck-though: Copper foil

Retained Struck-through: Die Fill 

Retained Struck Through Errors

Retained Struck-through: Scrap Metal

Retained Struck-through: Struck-in Plastic

Retouched Date

Retouching of Design Elements; 1920-1940

Reverse Die Cap

Riddler

Rim Cud

Rim-restricted Design Duplication

Rim-Restricted First Strike

Rim-Restricted Second Strikes

Rim-to-rim Cud

Rockwell Test Mark in die

Rockwell Test Mark in planchet

Rolled-in scrap: Bristles from descaling brush

Rolled-in scrap: Steel sinuous wire

Rolled-Thick Planchet

Rolled-Thin Planchet

Rolling Fold (see Blanking Burr)

Rolling-Induced Fissures

Rolling Mill Error: Rolled-Thick Planchet

Rolling Mill Error: Rolled-Thin Planchet

Rolling Mill Error: Rolled-In Patterns and Textures

Rolling Mill Error: Rolled-In Cloth Pattern

Rolling Mill Error: Rolling Indentation

Rotated Die Error: Dynamic Rotation

Rotated Die Error: Stable Rotation

Rotated Hub Doubling

Rotated Mintmark

Rotating Collar Cud

Rotational Machine Doubling

Rusted Dies

S

Saddle Strike: Die Positioning Head to Base

Saddle Strike: Die Positioning Head to Head

Saddle Strike: Gap Between Adjacent Dies is Wide

Saddle Strike; With Hump

Saddle Strike; Without Hump

Saddle Strike; On Quarter Dollars

Sandwich Strike

Scraped-in Debris 

Second Strike Die Rotation

Second Strike Misalignment: Horizontal 

Second Strike Misalignment: Vertical

Second Strike-Same Denomination-Different Years

Shattered Die

Shattered Die: Broas Brother Baker Store Card Token 1863

Shield Nickel, 1867; with and without “rays” on the reverse

Shifted Die Cap Strike

Sideneck Strike

Single Squeeze Doubled Dies

Silver Eagle 2008 w/ 2007 reverse 

Skidding Coin Errors

Skidding Die Errors

Skidding Misalignment

Slag Inclusion

Slide Doubling (Machine Doubling) 

Slide Zone Ghost Elements

Small and Large Mint Mark Variations Used in the Same Year

Soft Die Errors 

Solder on Coins

Spackled Dies (Intentionally Applied Grease)

Split Dies: Asymmetrical

Split Dies: Median Bisecting

Split planchet: After strike

Split planchet: Before strike

Split Plating

Split Plating Afterimage

Split Plating Doubling

Solid Metal Denominational planchet Struck by Bi-metallic Dies

Squeezed in Debris

“Squeeze Job”

Standing Liberty Quarter, 1917; Type I and Type II

Stiff Collar Strike

Straight clips

Stress-Induced Surface Irregularities

Stretch Strikes

Struck Clad Layer Split Off After Strike

Struck-In Die Fragments

Struck on ‘Aluminum’ Feeder Fingers 

Struck on Experimental Planchet; Statehood Quarters

Struck on Feeder Fingers

Struck on Hardware

Struck on Larger Planchet or Coin: Malaysian assisted errors

Struck on Emery Disc

Struck on Thick Plating

Struck on a Blank  (“Type I Planchet)”

Struck on a Washer 

Struck Over Pre-Existing Wrong Planchet/Off-Metal Error

Struck Through Bulging Die Filling

Struck Through a Clad Layer

Struck Through a Dropped Filling; Isolated

Struck Through: Feed Finger

Struck Through: Grease /Oil

Struck Through Floating Encrustation

Struck Through: Hardware

Struck Through a Late Stage Die Cap

Struck Through: Cloth

Struck Through Shavings

Struck Through a Split Die Cap

Struck Through a Split or Torn in two by struck-through object

Struck Through String

Struck Through Wire

Stutter Strikes

Stutter Strikes (Type I):

Stutter Strike (Type II):

Stutter Strike (Type III):

Stutter Strikes due to Planchet Flexion 

Subsurface Corrosion

Surface Film Effects

Susan B. Anthony 1979 dollar; Near Date

T

Tapered Planchets

Thinning of Design Elements Due to Abrasion

Tilted Die Clash (see Vertical Misaligned Die Clash)

Tilted Die Error

Tilted Hub Doubling

Tilted Mintmark 

Totally Separated Mintmarks

Trails

Transitional Reverse 1940 nickel with reverse of 1938 or 1940

Transitional Reverse 1964-D quarter with the “Type C” reverse of 1965

Transitional Reverse 1969, 1970, and 1970-D dime with 1968 proof reverse

Transitional Reverse 1988-D and P Lincoln cents with reverse of 1989

Transitional Reverse 1992-D and P cent with “Close AM” reverse

Transitional Reverse 2008-P Silver Eagle Bullion Coin with 2007-P Reverse

Two Anvil Dies

Two Hammer Dies

U

Uniface strike (full) 

Un-plated coins (non-error)

Un-plated Lincoln Cents

Unstruck Planchet (Type I)

Unstruck Planchet (Type II)

Upset Mill Error: Abnormal Upset

Upset Mill

Use of cancelled and defaced dies 

Use of Flat, Featureless Dies

V

Vertical Collar Crack

Vertically Misaligned Die Error

Vickers Test Mark left in die

W

Waffled Coins

Wavy Steps

Weak Strike

Well-Defined Rings on Euro Coins

Wide Collar

With and Without Arrows; 1853 U. S. Coins

Wrong Date

Wrong Metal and off-metal: Wrong Stock Planchet Errors

Wrong Metal and off-metal: Coins struck on washers, gears, and other hardware

Wrong Ring

Wrong Stock – Off Metal

X – Y – Z

Yanked-Out Fillings

Z-fold

Zinc Core 

Zinc Deterioration on Copper Plated Lincoln Cents

Ejection Impact Doubling

Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:

Post-Strike Die Contact:

Ejection impact doubling


Definition:
Ejection impact doubling (EID) is a type of post-strike design transfer that occurs when a newly-struck coin is propelled or thrust into the face of the retreating hammer die. It appears on Sacagawea dollars struck in the year 2000 and on several 2017-P America The Beautiful quarter dollars. Almost all the Sacagawea dollars are from the Philadelphia Mint. Many different die pairs are represented. Affected specimens show scattered design elements on the areas of highest relief on the obverse face. The most iconic feature is a disembodied iris and pupil from Sacagawea’s right-positioned eye (the left eye from her perspective). The “extra eye” is most often seen between Sacagawea’s eyebrows and along the bridge of her nose. It has, however, turned up in other areas.

Ejection impact doubling is not related to, and should not be confused with, any form of machine doubling.

The 2000-P Sacagawea dollar seen at left shows an extra right iris and pupil between Sacagawea’s eyebrows. Another specimen, on the right, shows the “extra eye” well down along her nose.  This eye is rotated more than 90 degrees counterclockwise relative to its normal counterpart.
 
 
Another 2000-P Sacagawea dollar (left) shows the extra right eye located on Sacagawea’s left cheek, below the normal left eye. The final specimen (right) shows an indentation in Sacagawea’s nose, also caused by post-strike die contact.


Ejection impact doubling appears during a single year within the America The Beautiful series of quarter dollars. Duplicated incuse peripheral letters appear on the reverse face of the 2017-P Frederick Douglass 25c, the 2017-P George Rogers Clark 25c, and the 2017-P Ellis Island 25c. More than one duplicate set of letters may appear. Within a single coin, the extra letters may be shifted in more than one direction relative to the normal letters. Rotational and medial displacement can be severe. The corresponding raised letters on the hammer (reverse) die face are the features most likely to make light contact with a coin that has been launched upward or a coin that has been thrust upward by the anvil die in preparation for ejection. The anvil die or the hammer die would presumably have to be mistimed for contact to occur.

Most of the examples were discovered by Bill Wood, including all those shown here.

In this 2017-P Frederick Douglass quarter dollar, duplicate versions of each S of DOUGLASS are shifted a full letter length (1.0 mm) toward the coin’s center.

In a second Douglass quarter dollar from the same die pair, the D of DOUGLASS is shifted down 0.4 mm and leftward 0.8mm.

In this 2017-P George Rogers Clark quarter dollar, horribly smeared copies of the first five letters of GEORGE are located on the design rim.

In a second Clark quarter dollar, two smeared copies of the G of GEORGE are each shifted 1 ½ letters to the right (1.2mm). One copy is located on the design rim, while the second copy is located slightly south of the normal letter.

2011 04 18

Dimpled Andrew Johnson Presidential dollars defy diagnosis

 By Mike Diamond | April 09, 2011,10:00 a.m.

Article first published in 2011-04-18, Expert Advice section of Coin World

 Dimples extend inward from all the peripheral letters and numbers on the obverse face of this 2011-D Andrew Johnson Presidential dollars. The dimples were apparently produced by corresponding elevations on the field portion of the die. The origin of these elevations is unclear.

 Images courtesy of Mike Diamond

 51810228 (1)

In my capacity as an error researcher I am frequently confronted with unfamiliar and, at times, inexplicable errors. It is an experience that most longtime collectors and researchers find familiar.

My colleague Robert “BJ” Neff was recently handed a doozy of a mystery by error dealer Fred Weinberg. He sent Neff three 2011-D Andrew Johnson Presidential dollars that show a peculiar effect on the obverse face. All of the peripheral design
elements display a shallow dimpled field along their inner side. In other words, the dimples form a centrally directed, converging radial pattern. The effect is easily seen in the accompanying photos, all of which were taken by Neff.

The first problem to address was whether these dimples represented a die error, a planchet error or a striking error. It was immediately apparent that the anomaly was present on the die face. The dimples are identical on all three dollars, and a careful study of die markers undertaken by Neff showed that they were all struck by the same die pair. The presence of dimples on the coin means that the field portion of the die face must have been elevated right next to each peripheral design
element.

But what could produce such elevations? My thoughts initially gravitated toward some form of die deterioration doubling. Incuse forms of die deterioration doubling are known among copper-plated zinc cents and on some state quarters. But I’ve never seen a case in which the incuse doubling is located along the inner margin of the normal, raised design elements. Most of the time the doubling extends from the lateral margin of the affected design elements.

Finally, incuse die deterioration doubling is associated with other signs of die deterioration, such as a swollen field or concentric ripples in the field. None of the Andrew Johnson dollars show signs of die deterioration; they seem to conform to an early die state. Still, I can’t entirely dismiss a novel form of premature,
incuse die deterioration doubling.

Could the defects have been present on master die or a working hub? Probably not, since we’d then expect the dimples to be more widespread among Andrew Johnson dollars. Right now it looks like the dimples are restricted to a single working die.

I had to abandon the idea that the dimples were caused by an abnormally soft working hub or an abnormally hard working die. Either could result in slight compression of raised elements on the face of the working hub and possibly displace enough metal alongside each element to a form pressure ridge. However, were that pressure ridge to be driven into the face of the working die, it would leave a recess. And that, in turn, would leave a bump instead of a dimple on the coin.

 Neff has speculated that the dimples arose during the final phases of hubbing as a result of uneven cooling and contraction of the working die face. He correctly notes that the working die heats up during hubbing as the harder working hub forces its way down through the cone-shaped face of the unfinished working die.

After the “squeeze” is completed, the working die begins to cool and, according to Neff, contracts ever so slightly. If the cooling and contraction is uneven and particularly severe, one side of each peripheral recess on the working die face might find its way blocked by the corresponding raised element on the face of the working hub. This could cause a slight pressure ridge to form before the hub is lifted off the die face. The pressure ridge would be responsible for the dimple on the coin’s surface.

While this scenario is possible, I would have expected the phenomenon to have appeared before now and to be much more common.

 Until we have a better understanding of the nature and origin of these dimples, it’s best to assign them a nonspecific designation. I would suggest something along the lines of “dimpled design extensions” or “design extension dimples.” While I’m not a great fan of placeholder terms, it’s the best we can do. We certainly wouldn’t be alone in this. After all, astrophysicists have applied the terms “dark matter” and “dark energy” to phenomena that they don’t understand.

I invite the readers of this column to submit other examples of dimples. Perhaps other dies will show the effect. A larger, more diverse sample might illuminate the situation.

 

Coin World’s Collectors’ Clearinghouse department does not accept coins or other items for examination without prior permission from News Editor William T. Gibbs. Materials sent to Clearinghouse without prior permission will be returned unexamined. Please address all Clearinghouse inquiries to: cweditor@coinworld.com or to (800) 673-8311, Ext. 172.

 

http://www.coinworld.com/articles/dimpled-andrew-johnson-presidential-dollars-d/

 

Copyright
2012 by Amos Hobby Publishing Inc. Reposted by permission from the March 22,
2012, issue of Coin World.)

 

 

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Next Page »
  • Home
  • Introduction To This Website
  • Error-ref.com News
  • Comprehensive Error-Variety Checklist
  • Index Of Completed Entries
  • Part I. Die Subtypes:
  • Part II. Die Varieties:
  • Part III. Die Installation Errors:
  • Part IV. Die Errors:
  • Part V. Planchet Errors:
  • Part VI. Striking Errors:
  • Part VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:
  • Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:
  • Part IX. Post-Strike Mint Damage:
  • Part X. Wastebasket / Composite Categories:
  • Part XI. Non Errors:
  • Featured Articles Of Interested
  • Interest & Not So Interesting Facts
  • Other Sites And Forums Of Interest
  • Our Thanks Go To
  • About The Authors
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025