Error-Ref.com

You are here: Home / Search for "center"

Search Results for: center

Bi-metallic Wrong Core Inserted

PART V. Planchet Errors:

Bi-metallic Errors:

Wrong Core inserted

Definition: Bi-metallic error coins are restricted to foreign countries. These coins may experience any of the many types of striking errors listed in the Error-Variety Ready Reference however, one must understand we are dealing with two components, a ring & a core. Any number of exotic possibilities or combinations of die varieties, die errors, planchet errors & striking errors can be found on bi-metallic coinage.

An incorrect core is wrongly inserted into the ring center hole. Occurrences are extremely rare.

A 2006 two pound technology from Great Britain having a steel core inserted before strike. (Core is strongly attracted to a magnet).

The weight of this error coin is 9.23 g, well below the 12.0 g for a normal bi-metallic of this series.

A normal two pound core consists of the following composition and weight:

Two pound core 75% Copper, 25% Nickel Core – 6.0 g

A 2005 Chilean 100 Pesos having an aluminum core inserted before strike.

The weight of this error coin is 3.94 g, well below the 7.58 g for a normal bi-metallic of this series.

A normal 100 pesos core consists of the following composition and weight: 100 Pesos Core 70% Copper, 15% Nickel, 15% Zinc Core – 4.20g

Bi-metallic Wrong Ring

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Bi-metallic Errors:

Wrong Ring

Definition: Bi-metallic error coins are restricted to foreign countries. These coins may experience any of the many types of striking errors listed in the Error-Variety Ready Reference however, one must understand we are dealing with two components, a ring & a core. Any number of exotic possibilities or combinations of die varieties, die errors, planchet errors & striking errors can be found on bi-metallic coinage.

Occurs when a normal core is joined with a wrong ring. These errors are unequivocally rare.

Note the following specification information regarding U.K. outer rings: 12.0 g is normal weight for a bi-metallic of this series. A two pound ring consists of the following composition and weight: Two pound ring 76% Copper, 4% Nickel, 20% Zinc Weight – 6.0 g

A two pound 2006 Isambard Brunnel from Great Britain.

The ring is is strongly attracted to a magnet. (Either elemental nickel or steel composition).

Weight: 10.30 grams.

A two pound Technology from Great Britain. Ring is strongly attracted to a magnet (steel ring). The ring also has a misaligned center hole. The ring is much thinner than the core resulting in the near incomplete absence of design transfer on either face of the ring. The ring also sheared & snapped when struck.

A two pound 2007 Gun Powder Plot from Great Britain with wrong ring. The ring also has a misaligned center hole. The ring is thinner than the core resulting in the absence of some design transfer on either face of the ring.

Assay Value Repunched

PART II. Die Varieties:

Other Re-punched or Re-engraved Design Elements:

Repunched Assay Value 

 

This 1899 (88), 1 Real from Guatemala has an assay value of 0.500.  In other words, it’s 50% silver. However, the second zero shows “ears” (black arrows) that at one time were part of a 5, making the original assay value 0.550. The errant 5 was repunched with a 0 to correct the mistake. The image to the right shows an overlay to verify the identity and position of the underlying 5. This 1 Real also has a repunched date with a 99 over an 88.

 

Asymmetrical Split Die

PART IV. Die Errors:

Split Dies:

Asymmetrical split die

Definition: A split die develops when a rim-to-rim die crack extends deep into the die neck and die shank (shaft). The width of the split is proportional to its depth of penetration. Split dies usually divide the die face into two sub-equal parts. These may be termed “median”, “bisecting”, or “symmetrical” split dies. When the split is off to one side, we call it an asymmetrical split die. The path can be straight, curved, or irregular.

An asymmetrical split die shows only lateral spread. This allows collectors to discriminate this error from retained cuds. While the latter may show lateral spread, they also exhibit vertical displacement and/or horizontal offset (see retained cud).

Below is an asymmetrical split die on the obverse of a 1981 (P or D) nickel. The surface appears irregular and fuzzy because it also has a multi-level strike-through error, evidently produced by some thin, folded metal. That metal was probably derived from a torn and crumpled die cap. Split die errors often co-occur with capped die strikes.

 

Below is an asymmetrical split die on the obverse of a 1978 Mexican 20 centavos.

About Us




About Us


This site will be another featured information guide for numismatists who collect error and variety coins. Mike Diamond who has long been considered one of the nations top error coin experts, with the help of BJ Neff, who has constructed traildies.com and MADdieclashes.com, will be the main contributors to this site which will strive towards bring the most recent and accurate information to coin collectors.



Jeff Ylitalo has joined our adventure into this project. Jeff is the editor of ERRORSCOPE and a long time error and variety collector.


About The Authors

Senior Editor – Mike Diamond

43510070

Mike Diamond has been collecting, researching, and writing about error coins since 1997. He currently writes the thrice-monthly column “Collector’s Clearinghouse” for the national coin weekly Coin World. He usually has at least one article in every issue of Errorscope, the bi-monthly magazine of CONECA, the Combined Organizations of Numismatic Error Collectors of America. Mike served as President of CONECA for two full terms and was a board member for several cycles previous to his election as President.  He is one of two error examiners for the club.

Mike has discovered, defined, or refined the understanding of countless error types of the years, including design ablation errors, stutter strikes, invisible strikes, ejection impact doubling, stiff collar errors, “greasy ghosts”, atypical chain strikes, external chain strikes, rim-restricted design duplication, die subsidence errors, and surface film effects.

Mike was instrumental in developing maddieclashes.com, a site dedicated to the world of unusual die clashes and also is a co-author on traildies.com.

Contributing Editor – BJ Neff

picture for FUN

Robert (BJ) Neff became interested in numismatics after retiring with honors from the U.S. Navy Submarine Force in October of 1982. He spent 21 years of service on 4 different submarines in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. BJ Neff retired from the service in Hawaii, while stationed at NSTCP, teaching anti-submarine warfare.

At first, the main focus of his interest in this hobby was with the United States Lincoln and Indian head cents. However, in 2003, after discovering his first accredited variety Lincoln cent, he became enamored with error and variety coins. Since that time, most of his efforts have been devoted to that sector of numismatics.

While serving in the U.S. Navy, he became a qualified instructor and he has taken this learned skill to conduct presentations on various coin topics for the F.U.N. conventions, the Central Florida Coin Club and other local coin clubs. He has also written numerous articles for FUN Topics, The HUB (NCADD’s bi-monthly publication) and Errorscope (CONECA’s bi-monthly publication). His article in the 2009 summer FUN Topics, “Something New from China?” was presented the “Charles B. Fine” award for best article of that year.

BJ Neff is presently an active member of ANA, Central Florida Coin Club, CONECA, Florida United Numismatists, Fly-In-Club and the Numismatic Literary Guild. He is also a variety coin attributer for Coppercoins.com. Jeanie Neff (his wife) and BJ Neff were presented the Dr. Lyndon King award from CONECA for the most outstanding club member(s) of that organization for the year 2008.

A few years ago, BJ Neff began a new endeavor and developed a numismatic web site called traildies.com. This site is dedicated to a die anomaly found on both United States and Foreign coinage called trails / wavy steps. In mid 2010, BJ Neff and Mike Diamond designed another numismatic web site named maddieclashes.com. This site provides the numismatists with information concerning the many different and varied die clashes that are found not only on U. S. coins, but foreign coins as well. Both maddieclashes.com and traildies.com are free information sites.

Contributing Editor – Jason Cuvelier

50192117

Jason Cuvelier is an artist who was born in Colorado in 1973. At the age of 10 he became interested in type collecting U.S. coins from pocket change and was encouraged by his grandfather, a lifelong collector of coins himself. Always a collector of about everything, from comic books to action figures and stamps, numismatic varieties won out and became his primary interest. In the last few years Jason has been able to combine his expertise with photography and Photoshop to document hundreds of different varieties and errors. He is currently on the CONECA Bod (Secretary) and a moderator at The lincolncentresource.net. Jason currently is an artist educator at a high school in Chappaqua, NY. He received a BFA from the Maryland Institute College of Art in 1995, an MFA from Yale University in 1998. Jason taught drawing and painting as a Lecturer at Yale from 1999-2001, worked at Christie’s Auction House in New York from 2001-2007. Jason currently attributes for maddieclashes.com and traildies.com, as well as cataloging coins with Lathe Lines listed on errorvariety.com.

Contributing Editor – Jeff Ylitalo

48824795

Jeff Ylitalo has collected error & variety coins since 1993. He has avidly researched & written about this area of numismatics since 2006. Jeff is the editor for the Erroscope, CONECA’s bi-monthly magazine since 2008. A highly decorated combat veteran, Jeff enlisted in the US Army in 1979 ending his 32 year professional soldiering career as an aviation expert in 2011. Jeff’s numismatic interests & inquisitiveness eventually led him down a path which converged with like minded individuals whose ambition & established notoriety in the hobby includes the authors listed above.

Senior Consulting Editor – Fred Weinberg

48834337

Fred Weinberg is the President of the Pacific Rim Numismatics (DBA Fred Weinberg & Co.) with offices in Encino, California (Los Angles). The firm offers numismatic coin and trading expertise in the areas of United States Rare Gold & Silver coinage, as well as specializing in buying and selling Major Mint Error coinage of all types. The company is an active force in the wholesale market, trading with dealers, banks and investors internationally. He is one of the original 31 firms selected as an authorized PSGS dealer in 1986

Fred Weinberg is a highly respected numismatist, with 33 years of full time experience in the rare coin market. He has provided the numismatic expertise to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Trade Commission (FTC), many U. S. and European banks and insurance companies. He has also been called on by the U. S. Secret Service for his help in determining the authenticity of gold coins and has made hundreds of trips to Europe in the last 25 years, purchasing over $500 million in U. S. gold coins from European banks, dealers and estates alone. He has also worked on cases for the Los Angles District Attorney’s Office and many other law enforcement agencies throughout the country.

Additionally, in 1973 he was the only professional coin dealer selected by the U. S. General Services Administration (GSA) to examine and identify the many varieties represented among the 2.5 million Carson City silver dollars held at the U. S. Bullion Depository, at West Point, New York. He has also made special “floor tours” of the Philadelphia Mint to study ongoing changes in the Minting Process.

He is a contributor to the “Red Book” (Guide Book of United States Coins) and has been featured on CNN, Discovery Channel and many local TV news programs in cities across the United States. He is the co-author of “The Error Coin Encyclopedia – 3rd Edition” published in 2000 and the “The Error Coin Encyclopedia – 4th Edition” published in 2004. He has contributed to numerous numismatic books and rare coin articles, including research on the Minting Process and Major Mint Error coins.

His interest in Mint Error coins and currency goes back to the early 1960’s. He has a reputation worldwide for being a strong buyer of Major Error coins and maintains an inventory of almost 100,000 pieces. Mr. Weinberg is an in-demand speaker on the topics of Numismatic Errors, the Minting Process and the Coin Industry. He is the authenticator for all Major Mint Error Coins for the Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS) Mint Error encapsulation program.

An avid coin collector since the age of 12, he understands the interest of both collector and investor. His professional associations include the American Numismatic Association (ANA) (36 years), The Professional Numismatist Guild (PNG) (29 years), The Industry Council for Tangible Assets (ICTA) (19 years) and the Numismatic Literary Guild. He is past President of the Professional Numismatist Guild (1999-2001).

Consulting Editor – Jon Sullivan

50192147

Jon Sullivan became interested in coins when I attended a Civil War relic show which was also being held in conjunction with a coin show. I wandered into the coin show and was intrigued and fascinated by all the coin designs as well as how old they where! I bought several coins and a few weeks later bought a coin price guide and some coin albums and began collecting coins in earnest. A year or two later, I received a book entitled “U.S. Coin Variety and Oddity Guide” by Spadone. The book introduced me to the anomalies which can occur on coins, and I began searching rolls for mistakes, as well as collecting errors and varieties. Later, when I was 13, I decided I wanted to be a coin dealer, and a year or two later, I decided to become an error coin dealer. I currently deal in error coins part-time, and also collect error coins as well as U.S. Type coins. In a few years I will be a full-time error coin dealer.

I live in Tennessee near Nashville, and travel much of year due to my job, which is working as a PDR (paintless dent repair) technician. I fix vehicles which were damaged by hail storms, but due to the small number of hail storms, I have to travel wherever the work is in the U.S. Some of my non-numismatic interests include mountain biking, history, my church, fishing, and business.

Consultant Editor & Web Master – Peter Lukic

Peter 

Peter Lukic is an accomplished art director, designer and photographer specializing in print, web and marketing. Based in Northern New Jersey, he has a broad client base and has worked on projects ranging from national magazine accounts to museum installations and catalogs. He is currently the art director of the Garden State Film Festival in Atlantic City, NJ and is working on a variety of marketing and identity projects for his other clients.

Peter is a co-owner of the Lincoln Cent Resource and specializes in collecting Lincoln varieties and errors. Through his work with BJ Neff, he has helped to do outreach and expand the hobby to a younger generation of potential hobbyists.

Contributing Editor – JC Stevens

J.C. Stevens is a retired information technology specialist who lives in Colorado. He studied at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs. He worked for Cray Research, Cray Computer & MCI. He is currently a general partner in a number of restaurants on the Western Slope of Colorado.

JC started collecting the Lincoln Cent in the 1950’s. He became interested in error and variety coins in the late 1990’s.

JC is presently an active member of ANA, CONECA, CSCC & CSNS.

Contributing Editor – Will Brooks

Will Brooks is a water treatment specialist working primarily in the Amish dairy industry in beautiful Lancaster County, PA. He studied mathematics and philosophy at the University of Pittsburgh and Millersville University. He is the president of the central Pennsylvania chapter of Mensa, and is also a member of the International Society for Philosophical Enquiry. His collecting interests are focused on U.S. cent varieties. He is also an editor and does attributions for traildies.com, and you can often find him at  lincolncentforum.com answering questions. He also enjoys swimming, writing, and all things Frisbee.

Editor – Shane Daniel

Shane Daniel has been collecting coins since his early teen years and became more serious about the hobby roughly half a decade ago. His particular focus is on minor errors and varieties found in circulation and through coin roll hunting. He is addicted to the thrill of the hunt and the frugality of finding rare numismatic treasures at face value.

Specific interests include design subtypes, die errors (e.g., cuds, BIEs, clashes, cracks, dents), die varieties (e.g., RPMs, OMMs, and mintmark styles), rotated dies, and the various types of doubling. He enjoys skimming through old and new catalogs containing such anomalies and has contributed to the hobby with numerous personal discoveries.

Shane values education and has been blessed with several high-quality mentors through the years. He enjoys collaborating with other coin enthusiasts to create mini-research papers, synopses, and detailed graphics.

You can find Shane on Facebook groups (some of which he helps manage) and occasionally online forums, answering coin questions and providing error-variety knowledge.

Abnormal Upset

Part V: Planchet Errors:

Upset Mill Errors:

Abnormal Upset

Definition: This anomaly is visible only on unstruck planchets and off-center strikes. Affected planchets carry a pattern of upset that is distinctly different from other planchetsof the same denomination and time period.

Possible causes for abnormal upset are:

1. A worn or damaged groove in the upset mill.

2. Improperly machined grooves

3. Use of upsetting equipment intended for a different

denomination (domestic or foreign)

4. Use of upsetting equipment with grooves of an experimental nature

5. Circumferential pre-strike damage that resembles the effects of upsetting

The appearance of abnormal upset is highly variable and suggests many different causes.

Note: Several Examples are shown below.

Depicted below is an undated, off-center nickel showing an unusually prominent proto-rim, a very wide bevel, and a thin, flattened center strip along the edge. Nickel planchets generally show a very low proto-rim, a very short bevel (or one that is entirely absent), and a broad, flat edge.

 

The three images below depict an undated, off-center nickel that may not even have been struck on a nickel planchet. The leaden gray color, matte interior texture, and complete absence of tumbling marks suggests an unexpected origin and an unorthodox entry into the production stream. In any case, the pattern of upset (if that’s what it is) is bizzare. The proto-rim is broad and tall and has a sharp internal margin. A thin, pleated apron extends in from the internal margin of the proto-rim and rests lightly on the planchet’s surface. The upper/outer surface of the proto-rim shows a broad slope that almost looks machined. The edge is smooth and strongly convex.

The pleated apron suggests that this is a form of circumferential pre-strike damage, and not any intended style of upset.


This undated, zinc cent depicted below has a light dusting of copper plating distributed in a bulls-eye fashion. The pattern of upset is wholly unlike a normal cent. The proto-rim is narrow, moderately tall, and sharply defined. There is no bevel. The edge is flat and vertical. A normal cent planchet shows a reasonably distinct, but blunt proto-rim with a beveled rim/edge junction.

Abnormally Strong Strike Due to Stacked Coins

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Abnormally Strong Strike:

Due to Stacked Coins or Planchets

 Definition: Effective striking pressure is always increased when the aggregate thickness between the dies is increased.  An extra planchet or coin inserted into the striking chamber will cause a significant increase in effective striking pressure.  If one or both coins are struck within the collar, those coins confined by the collar will show strong finning.  Finning occurs when coin metal squeezes into the narrow gap between die neck and collar. If one or both coins are struck outside the collar, they will expand enormously.

This 1998(P) Lincoln cent was stuck twice, with a 95% indent on the second strike. The first strike was a normal strike that failed to eject from the striking chamber. The second strike occurred with a planchet on top of the newly-struck coin.  Neither coin was confined by the collar during the second strike.  As a result, both coins were broadstruck.  The bottom coin, pictured above, expanded to the size of a quarter dollar. The reason AMERICA is noticeably doubled is that this part of the coin was pushed beyond the limits of the striking chamber as the bottom coin expanded from the pressure of the two stacked discs. Other doubled design elements include the G of  FG (the designer’s initials), the C of CENT and the O of ONE.

Absent Edge Lettering

PART VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:

Edge Lettering:

Absent Edge Lettering

Definition: This error occurs when a Native American or Presidential dollar bypasses the edge lettering device or when the spacing between the lettering die and impeller wheel becomes too generous.

The United States Mint states:

“The $1 Coins are inscribed on the edge without regard to their “heads” (obverse) or “tails” (reverse) orientation. In addition, the location of the inscriptions around the circumference of the coin with relation to the obverse and reverse designs will vary as well. This is because the United States Mint incuses these inscriptions on the edge of each coin at the second step of a two-step coining process.

In the first step, the blanks are fed into a coining machine which strikes the obverse and reverse designs onto the coins, and dispenses the coins into a large bin. In the second step, the bin is transported to the edge-incusing machine, into which the coins are fed at random, without regard to their heads or tails orientation.

Therefore, statistically, approximately one-half of the coins produced will have edge-lettering oriented toward the heads side, and approximately one-half of the coins will have the edge-incused inscriptions oriented toward the tails side.”

If the second step of this process is not completed, the coin will not have the edge lettering applied.

Statement provided by the U. S. Mint; http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/$1coin/?action=edgeIncused

The above images show a 2007(?) George Washington dollar coin without the edge inscription. Since the mintmark is included in the edge lettering it is unknown which mint this error originated from. Images are courtesy of Fred Weinberg.

Acid Shrunk Coins

PART XI. Non-Errors:

Alterations:

Acid Damage

Definition:  As the name implies, an “acid damage” is a coin that has been immersed in a corrosive solution, most likely a strong acid.

The diagnostics of an acid damaged coin include:

1. A diameter smaller than normal.

2. Perfect centering of the design.

3. Uniformly mushy design on both faces.

4. Thin or absent design rim.

5. Lack of metal flow in design elements bordering the coin’s edge.

The surface may or may not show an unusual texture.

This 1958-D Lincoln cent has been altered by submerging the coin in acid. The coin weighs 1.6 g (normal weight is 3.1 g).  Diameter is 18.08 mm in diameter instead of the normal 19.05 mm.  Thickness is 1.6 mm. Urban legend has it that most of these Lincoln cents were shrunk in high school laboratories as part of an academic experiment. Whether this is true or not is uncertain.

The 1965(P) Washington quarter shown below has been attacked by acid. Both faces of the coin have a granular texture and the dimensions of the coin have been reduced. The coin now weighs 4.65 g (normal is 5.67 g) and it has a diameter of 22.79 mm (normal is 24.25 mm).

This coin is courtesy of Robert Russell.

The 1914-D Type II Indian head or Buffalo nickel shown below has been subjected to an acid treatment called “nick-a-date”. The acid reveals the dates on otherwise dateless nickels. The acid in this treatment has also altered the coin’ weight from 5 g to 4.49 g. Acid enhancement is frowned upon by collectors, who would view this semi-key coin as nothing more than a worthless, damaged nickel.

The 1892 Liberty nickel shown below has been altered by an acid treatment. The surfaces of the coin are very grainy and the overall weight has been reduced from 5 g to 4.44 g.

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • …
  • 52
  • Next Page »
  • Home
  • Introduction To This Website
  • Error-ref.com News
  • Comprehensive Error-Variety Checklist
  • Index Of Completed Entries
  • Part I. Die Subtypes:
  • Part II. Die Varieties:
  • Part III. Die Installation Errors:
  • Part IV. Die Errors:
  • Part V. Planchet Errors:
  • Part VI. Striking Errors:
  • Part VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:
  • Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:
  • Part IX. Post-Strike Mint Damage:
  • Part X. Wastebasket / Composite Categories:
  • Part XI. Non Errors:
  • Featured Articles Of Interested
  • Interest & Not So Interesting Facts
  • Other Sites And Forums Of Interest
  • Our Thanks Go To
  • About The Authors
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025