Error-Ref.com

You are here: Home / Search for "center"

Search Results for: center

Die Crack Curved Rim To Rim or Pre Cud

PART IV. Die Errors:

Die cracks:

Arcing rim-to-rim die crack (a.k.a., pre-cud) 

Definition:  A die crack that follows a curved trajectory from one point on the rim to another.  The area of the die face cordoned off by such a crack generally amounts to less than 40% of the total area.  The die crack shows only lateral spread.  The presence of either vertical displacement or horizontal offset would indicate the presence of a retained cud.  If the lateral spread exceeds half-a-millimeter, it should be labeled a curved, asymmetrical split die. 

An arcing rim-to-rim die crack may progress to a retained cud, a cud, or an asymmetrical split die.

A prominent pre-cud die crack is present on the reverse of the 1985 cent depicted below. There is no vertical displacement or horizontal offset, so one must assume this area was still attached to the main portion of the die. It also has a large cud in the SE quadrant of the reverse. In addition to that it shows a curved, roughened area of die damage in the NW quadrant caused by a collision between the reverse die and the broken surface of the loose die fragment. That collision might have caused the die to crack in this area.

Below is the reverse of a 1985 cent that shows (1) a large cud in the SE quadrant, (2) a “pre-cud” die crack in the NW quadrant, and (3) a curved, roughened area of die damage in the NW quadrant. The die damage is from a collision between the obverse die and the die fragment that broke away from the SE quadrant.

 

Close-up of the pre-cud die crack. It could conceivably have worsened to become a cud, a retained cud, or an asymmetrical split die.

 

Die Rotation Error: Dynamic

PART IV. Die Errors:

Rotated Die Error:

Dynamic Rotation

Definition: In a rotated die error, one of the dies spins around its vertical axis.  In the case of a normal, in-collar rotated die error, it is impossible to determine which die has rotated.  Complex and compound rotated die errors — where the die rotation is combined with at least one other error — do allow us to determine which die rotated.  In the vast majority of cases, the hammer die is the culprit.

Die rotation errors can be stable or dynamic.  This 1945 S Lincoln cent has been found with different degrees of rotation  between the dies making its movement dynamic. It is shown in the images below with a 50° rotation between the obverse to reverse die.

Design Scraped Off Ablation Second Strike

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Design Ablation Error:On Second Strike

Definition: The die-struck design on the surface of a coin is scraped off by lateral (horizontal) die movement.  This can occur on a first or second strike.

This quadruple-struck 2000-D Lincoln cent was struck with inverted dies (reverse die acting as hammer die).  The first strike was normal.  The third and fourth strikes were received in tandem as the coin straddled two adjacent striking chambers (a saddle strike).  The second strike was off-center, uniface, and incorporates a design ablation error.

During the second strike, the impact of the hammer die on the reverse face was relatively weak, even though the aggregate thickness it confronted was doubled by the presence of an an underlying planchet.  After making light contact with the surface of the coin, the hammer die shifted a considerable distance toward 12:00 (reverse clock position).  As the die moved northward, it completely scraped off the first-strike design elements and whatever second strike design elements were generated during the initial impact.  All that is left is a series of fine parallel striations that expose a little bit of the zinc core.

This is the only known example of a design ablation error on the second strike.

Die Attrition Error

Part IV. Die Errors:

Die Damage:

Peripheral Die Damage:

Die Attrition Error

Definition: This is the most recognizable and regular form of peripheral die damage.  A die attrition error is generated when a temporarily misaligned hammer die smacks repeatedly against the beveled entrance of the collar.  This wears away the edge of the field portion of the die and sometimes the entire rim gutter.  This leaves the coin with an unstruck, raised crescent on the face struck by the hammer die.  The internal margin of the crescent is smooth.  Particularly severe die attrition errors can leave peripheral letters significantly truncated.

Die attrition errors are especially abundant among 1983 cents.  A die attrition error
will only be detected after the hammer die has returned to center.

Die attrition errors are sometimes mistaken for cuds (marginal die breaks) and sometimes confused with other, more erratic forms of peripheral die damage and die loss.

The 1991-P quarter shown at upper left displays a severe die attrition error in the northwest quadrant of the obverse face.  The letters of LIBERTY are severely truncated.

The reverse face of a 1998-P quarter is shown at upper right.  The coin was struck with inverted dies (reverse die as hammer die).  The reverse face is nearly encircled by a die attrition error which is visible for about 300 arc degrees.  The attrition is most severe in the northwest quadrant.  The hammer die could have been rotating while it was experiencing a horizontal misalignment in a consistent direction.  It’s also possible that the hammer die (or die assembly) was shifting laterally in many different directions.  When this coin was struck, the hammer die had returned to center but was rotated 140 degrees counterclockwise relative to the obverse face.  The photo shows the orientation of the reverse face when the coin is flipped from left-to-right, with the obverse design oriented north.

48692990_scaled_384x351

Close-up of the word UNITED, where the tops of the letters have been lost.

48692557_scaled_352x132

Close-up showing the words STATES OF. Die loss becomes gradually less severe as you travel around the perimeter.

Coin Struck On A Type I Blank

PART V. Planchet Errors:

Upset Mill Errors:

Coin Struck on a Type I Blank:

Definition: This error type occurs when a blank does not pass through the upset mill and it is struck as a coin. Because it is not rolled and squeezed to a smaller diameter, no proto-rim is generated along the outer margin of the blank.  The edge is also not smoothed out, and instead retains a rough, cut-and-tear texture.

This copper-plated zinc cent was struck off-center on blank.  The outer margin of the blank is flat.  It lacks the elevated proto-rim of a planchet (“Type II planchet”).  Even though the edge of the blank was plated with copper before the strike, it still shows the rough, cut-and-tear texture that is usually seen on blanks and that results from the blank being pushed through a hole in a perforated base plate by the blanking die (punch).  It is very rare to find a copper-plated zinc cent that is struck on a blank.  We are aware of only three examples.

Coins Struck On Washers Gears And Other Hardware

Part V: Planchet Errors:

Wrong planchet and off-metal errors: 

Coins struck on washers, gears, and other hardware

.

Definition: Hardware includes washers, nuts, bolts, or machine parts such as malfunctioning feeder fingers.

 Below: A large Bolivian feed finger struck by 1 boliviano dies.

Below: A large feed finger struck by Chile 500 pesos dies.  This isa bimetallic issue.  A normal coin has been placed next to the struck tip of the feed finger.

The images below show a 1957-D Lincoln cent that has been struck on a washer. Images courtesy of Heritage Auctions.

This 2006-P North Dakota Statehood quarter was struck on a washer. The 1976-S Bicentennial Washington quarter pictured below was struck on a magnetic washer. This is not a proof coin, but was instead struck with a normal finish.  It was evidently struck with dies that were striking quarter dollars for a special mint set that was produced by the San Francisco Mint in that bicentennial year.
Images are courtesy of Heritage Auctions.
 5125176751251834
The 1776-1976 Bicentennial Washington quarter pictured below was struck on a magnetic washer. Images are courtesy of Jon Sullivan.

 

Cold Metal Flow




COLD METAL FLOW – This is the ability of a metal to be shape formed by an outside force without heating that metal. In coining, the dies are convex shaped (higher in the center that the rim) and when they strike the planchet, metal from the center of that planchet is forced outward in a radial pattern. This action is similar to dropping a pebble into a body of water. The displacement of the water caused by the intrusion of the pebble will cause a wave of water to travel outward from that center.




Collar Clash

Part IV. Die Errors:

Die Clash:

Collar Clash

A collar clash represents damage to the rim gutter of the die from contact with the collar.  It shows up most clearly in reeded issues, where it takes the form of serrations along the top or the edge of the design rim.  In an off-center strike, a collar clash will appear in the form of parallel grooves in the “slide zone”.

Collar clash is far more common on the hammer die.  It occurs when a temporarily misaligned hammer die collides with the top of the collar and/or scrapes along its working face.

When collar clash occurs on the anvil die, it is probably from a repeated up-and-down scraping action of the die neck against the working face of the collar.  However, a sharp sideways impact that drives the die neck into the collar’s
working face could also produce this pattern of serrations.

Below is a 1997-P dime with a collar clash from from K8-K12.

Another collar clash on a 1980-P Kennedy half dollar seen from K7-K11.

Below is two views of a defaced state quarter working hub with evidence of a previous collar clash. The grooves match the width and spacing of the reeding found on a quarter. The face was ground off down to the level of the rim gutter leaving some of the collar clash marks visible.

Complete Collar Break

PART IV. Die Errors:

Collar Cuds: 

Complete Collar Break

Definition: Here an entire segment of the collar’s working face (or hardened lining) breaks away, leaving a void that begins and ends quite abruptly. A key diagnostic for a full collar break is a “step-up” at both endpoints. The step marks the transition from the normal portion of the edge that shows collar contact to the area where coin metal was free to expand.

This 2000-D nickel depicted below is a stellar example of a complete collar break. About 100 arc degrees broke away, allowing the coin metal to flow into the resulting void. Both die faces show heavy die damage. The damage could be from fragments of the collar, or could indicate that both the collar and the dies were damaged by foreign matter that entered the striking chamber. Another sweet bonus is the small second strike that interrupts smooth convexity of the collar break at 1:00.

Because the gap in the collar was considerably smaller than 180 degrees, the planchet had no choice but to settle against the intact side of the collar. But this is not always the case, especially when the gap in the collar equals or exceeds 180 degrees

Left end of the collar break.

                         Right end of the collar break.

 

Compound And Complex Errors




Compound and Complex Errors


This section is dedicated to errors that just do not fit into one category because of their compound nature or complexity. You will also find error coins that are of a spectacular or very unusual nature.


This 2.5 gram
Canadian cent was struck sometime between 1982 and 1996.  On the
reverse face (struck by the hammer die) we see a dramatic tilted die error
(vertical misalignment).  Strong machine doubling affects the die-struck
maple leaf.  The die tilt may reflect a loose die, a loose die assembly,
or a die neck or die shaft that snapped in two.


The obverse
face (struck by the anvil die) features three or more overlapping
brockages of the reverse design.


This undated
dime shown above has a 50% cud.  The die fragment, while broad, was evidently rather
thin.  We know this because two shards of the broken die became trapped
between the roof of the void left in the die and the planchet represented by
this dime.  Each fragment left an indentation in the cud and generated
enough resistance for small areas of die-struck design to appear within the
large pucker on the reverse face.


  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • …
  • 52
  • Next Page »
  • Home
  • Introduction To This Website
  • Error-ref.com News
  • Comprehensive Error-Variety Checklist
  • Index Of Completed Entries
  • Part I. Die Subtypes:
  • Part II. Die Varieties:
  • Part III. Die Installation Errors:
  • Part IV. Die Errors:
  • Part V. Planchet Errors:
  • Part VI. Striking Errors:
  • Part VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:
  • Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:
  • Part IX. Post-Strike Mint Damage:
  • Part X. Wastebasket / Composite Categories:
  • Part XI. Non Errors:
  • Featured Articles Of Interested
  • Interest & Not So Interesting Facts
  • Other Sites And Forums Of Interest
  • Our Thanks Go To
  • About The Authors
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025