Error-Ref.com

You are here: Home / Search for "Doubled die"

Search Results for: Doubled die

Doubled Dies

PART II. Die Varieties:

Doubled Dies

Definition: A doubled die (hub doubling) is caused by a misalignment or a mismatch between a working hub and a working die.  The misalignment or mismatch occurs between a first and subsequent hubbing or sometimes in the course of a single hubbing. Misalignments can occur along three orthogonal planes and three orthogonal axes.  Doubled dies that are the result of a misalignment are variously characterized as rotated, offset, pivoted, or tilted.  Doubled dies that are the result of a design mismatch are variously characterized as “distended”, “distorted”, “modified” and “design hub doubling”.  A total of eight classes are recognized.

Coins struck from a doubled die will show doubling of the design elements. Doubling can be limited to one element or encompass much of the design. Doubling can be subtle or so extreme as to produce entirely separate elements of equal strength. All coins struck from a doubled die will show the same degree of doubling from coin to coin.

The correct terminology for this anomaly is “doubled die” or “hub doubling”.  No other term is acceptable.

CLASS I- Rotated Hub Doubling:

“Rotated hub doubling occurs when the die is turned either clockwise or counter clockwise on an axis near the center of the design between hubbings. It is characterized by having all devices nearer the rim doubled the most,while those near the center of the design are not doubled at all” ¹

1955-P Lincoln cent with rotated hub doubling or Class I.

Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins

1972-P Lincoln cent with rotated hub doubling or Class I.

Photograph courtesy of Coppercoins.

 

CLASS II – Distorted Hub Doubling:

“This class occurs when a hub flattens out between hubbings on a single die. This happens because the hubs are used to create a number of dies (often over a hundred). As with any malleable material, the steel flattens outward as it is used. If a die is first hubbed with a hub that is rather new and subsequently with an old hub, the devices near the outer edge will show doubling either towards the center of the design (flattened hub used first) or towards the edge of the design (flattened hub used last”.

“Class II hub doubling is most often characterized by doubling that parallels the outside edges of the  devices closest to the rim. The two primary requirements are that the spread be  directly toward or away from the rim (without rotation or pivot) and that there be clear separation lines in the doubling” ¹

1964P Lincoln cent with distorted hub doubling or Class II.

 

 Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins.

CLASS III – Design Hub Doubling:

This class of hub doubling “is caused when two different hubs with different designs are used to create one die. The design differences can be as minor as the exact placement of a single letter or design feature, or it can be as major
as two differently dated hubs.”¹

“ALL examples of what people refer to as “over-dates” in the twentieth century coin types are actually Class III doubled dies. This includes the 1918/7 – D nickel, both 1942/1 dimes, the 1943/2-P nickel, as well as others.”¹

“Design hub doubling is characterized by a difference in some part of the design rather than a misalignment of the design.”¹

A 1960 Lincoln cent proof die and 1960-D business strike working die, along with a 1970-S Lincoln cent proof working die, were hubbed with both the small date and large date hubs.

Class III: 1918/7-D Nickel                                                                   Class III: 1942/1-P Dime

 

Class III: 1960-D cent, small date over large date      Class III: 1970-S cent, hubbed with large and                                                                                                                                                                          small date                                                   

                                                                                    Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins

Class III: 1960-P Proof Lincoln cent hubbed with a small date over a large date. 

Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins

 

CLASS IV – Offset Hub Doubling:

“Offset hub doubling is caused when a die is returned to the hubbing press but is shifted to one side. The result is doubling of the design in a single cardinal direction – north, south, east, southwest, etc. This form of doubling is found more often affecting the center of the design than other classes of doubling, because regardless of the strength of the offset, all devices, including those in the center of the design, will show the same spread of doubling”. ¹

Class IV doubled die found on the reverse of the 1983-P Lincoln cent. Notice that the doubling is shifted directly to the north. 

Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins.

 

Class IV doubled die found on the obverse of a 1984-P Lincoln cent. Notice that the doubling is shifted directly to the south. 

Photographs courtesy of Coppercoins

 

CLASS V– Pivoted Hub Doubling:

“This class of hub doubling is one of the more common types of doubling. Its cause is very similar to that of Class I rotated hub doubling in that the alignment of the die that created the doubling involves clockwise or counterclockwise rotation. But in the case of Class V hub doubling, the center of rotation is at or near the rim, causing more doubling on one side of the design (the area opposite the pivot point) and little or no doubling near the pivot point.” ¹

This is a Class V doubled die found on the obverse of a 1995-P Lincoln cent. Notice that there is a well defined doubling on the letters in LIBERTY. Even the letters in IN GOD show considerable doubling while the date shows virtually no doubling what so ever. The pivot point was near the date and accounts for this feature of no doubling on the date. The black arrows are indicators pointing to die markers found on the obverse die.

 Photographs are courtesy of Coppercoins.

 

CLASS VI – Distended Hub Doubling: 

“This class is generally caused by using hubs to impress designs into improperly annealed dies. The design flattens out and becomes stretched or die tended toward the outside of the design. Like CLASS II doubled dies, CLASS VI doubled dies generally show their characteristics close to the rim.

The picture below shows a strong class VI doubled die, found on the obverse die of a 1944-D Lincoln cent. Notice the extra thickness on the bottoms of the digits in the date.

The pictures below show the same extra thickness in the motto E . PLURIBUS UNUM on the reverse die of a 1943 Lincoln cent. Notice the extra thickness in the dots and the bottoms of the letter U. This is a typical class VI doubled die. These photographs are courtesy of Coppercoins.

 

CLASS VII – Modified Hub Doubling:

“This class of doubling is caused when an errant part of the design is ground off a hub in an effort to replace it. If the errant portion of the design is not completely removed by the grinding it will leave its mark on any die created from the hub. The errant element is usually a digit or digits of the date, but it can be other parts of the design.” ¹

While modified hub doubling is an actual class, there is no substantiated evidence to prove that any examples of this class of doubling do exist. Any modification to a working hub that would show the type doubling described above would appear on numerous working dies and this has not been the case. It would also be senseless for the Mint to modify a working hub, use that hub to impress just one working die and then retire that hub; there has been no evidence to support that occurrence either. While there are various listings which have some Class VII doubled dies, there is no consensus between those various listing as to which particular dies are actually Class VII.

With the ambiguities surrounding this class of doubled dies, we shall not attempt to show examples of what this doubled die may appear as. However, we do support the definition of this class in hopes that a verifiable example
can be found.

 

CLASS VIII – Tilted Hub Doubling:

“Tilted hub doubling occurs when a die is set in the hubbing press tilted and rotated clockwise or counterclockwise from the hub. The resulting doubled die will show doubling on part of the design close to the rim, and the rest of the
design will be normal.” ¹

Again, some ambiguity surrounds this class of hub doubling. Some variety experts have included the tilted hub, instead of solely the tilted die, as the cause for this type of doubling. In this scenario the tilted hub accounts for
the majority of the single squeeze hubbed doubled dies (see Class IX) with or without a specific rotation to the hub.

A misnomer associated with this class is trail dies (including wavy steps). Some listings have this anomaly type under this class of die doubling. Our contention is that trail dies are not doubled dies and thus should not be listed under any class of hub doubling.

The photos below show a Class VIII hub doubling found on a 1964-P Lincoln cent. Notice the extra vertical bar above the L of LIBERTY and the slightly clockwise rotated second impression of the word IN.

 All photographs are courtesy of Coppercoins

.

CLASS IX – SHIFTED HUB DOUBLING:

“This form of doubling happens when a slightly misaligned (tilted) die “pops” into position under the constant pressure of the hub and its thousands of pounds of force.” ¹

 “It is most often characterized by a slippage of the design, in a cardinal direction – much like the Class IV offset hub doubling.  It most often affects centrally located design elements.  The main difference, with respect to causation, is that the design is never “picked up” off the die during the hubbing. Rather, it suddenly “slides” into place creating doubling in the design.” ¹

Once more there are some differences of opinions among the variety experts. John Wexler writes,” Class IX. God Only Knows – This class of doubling is for those doubled dies that are simply unexplained. It is for those extremely few doubled dies that defy logic and common sense. It is where the physical evidence does not support a reasonable conclusion on how the working die was hubbed to produce the secondary image.”

Those files that have the Class IX use it for listings of doubled dies that were made by the single squeeze hubbing system. However, this presents a problem for there is a grey area when the U.S. Mint used both the single squeeze and multiple hubbings to make dies. This transitional period extends from before 1986 (the first year that the U.S. Mint reported using the single squeeze hubbing system) to 1997 (when the single-squeeze hubbing was finally and fully implemented at both the Denver and Philadelphia mints for all denominations).  This time span contains a lot of doubled dies that cannot be confidently assigned to one or the other hubbing system.

Again, there are some listings in the Class IX doubled dies that contain files for trail dies(wavy steps). We feel that this is incorrect and that trail dies, including what is called wavy steps, are not doubled dies, but a different type of anomaly.

 

Notice the distortion seen in E . PLURIBUS . UNUM with extra thickness seen in the east / west plane. On early die state coins, division lines can be seen in the letters AME of AMERICA and the word OF. Also notice the split bottom serif on the last S of STATES.

These photographs are courtesy of Coppercoins

The second type of die doubling see with the single squeeze hubbing system occurs when the same offset in placement of the hub to the die occurs. Once again, the hubbing is initiated, but stopped by the press operator when the offset is detected. The the hub to die placement is correct and hubbing once again started. This start – stop – start of hubbing leaves Central located design doubling. Two examples of this type doubled die are shown below on 2004-P Lincoln cent reverse dies.

Photographs are courtesy of Coppercoins and taken by Gene Nichols.

 

Single squeeze hubbing produces doubled dies under two different scenarios. The first involves a hub that is offset relative to the die when the hubbing begins. During the hubbing, the offset is corrected by the increasing pressure that is felt on the hubbing plate, which causes the hub to slide into the correct position. Such doubled dies will have a “smeared” or elongated distortion to the design elements affected. Early die state coins will have division lines, along with split serifs, in the lettering and digits. Such an example is seen below which occurred on a 2004-P reverse die Lincoln cent.

Peripheral doubling is rare when the single squeeze hubbing system is used. The photos below show such doubling in the form of split serifs and division lines on the reverse of a 2004P Lincoln cent. The working hub had reached a point where most if not all of the design had already been transferred to the working die before the shift took place.

All photographs are from Billy Crawford.

 

Another example of single-squeeze peripheral design doubling occurs on a 2004-P Jefferson nickel, also known as the Peace nickel. Not only does the motto IN GOD WE TRUST show doubling, but also LIBERTY, the date, the star, the mint mark, the designer’s initials and Jefferson’s eyebrow.

¹ All quotations in this section are attributed to Chuck Daughtrey, unless otherwise indicated.

Part II. Die Varieties:


Reduction lathe doubling (master hub doubling)

Master die doubling (master die with a doubled die variety) (CW 7/27/20)

Broken hub (chipped hub) (CW 12/23/13, 5/21/18)

Hubbed-in debris (CW 5/27/13, 1/17/22)

Broken punch

Damaged punch

Defective punch

Longacre doubling (probably impressions of punch shoulders)

Doubled dies (incl. tripled dies, etc)

    • Rotated hub doubling (Class I) (CW 8/8/16)
      • 1872 Seated Liberty dime with 175 degree rotation (ES July/August 2003; CW 2/10/03)
    • Distorted hub doubling (Class II)
    • Design hub doubling (Class III)
    • Offset hub doubling (Class IV)
    • Pivoted hub doubling (Class V)
    • Distended hub doubling (Class VI)
    • Modified hub doubling (Class VII)
    • Tilted hub doubling (Class VIII)
    • Single-squeeze doubled dies (often attributed to Class VIII) (CW 2/14/05, 9/12/05)
      • Centrally-located doubling (CW 3/21/22)
      • Peripheral Doubling (CW 8/8/04)
    • Weaker impression hubbed last (e.g., 1963-D cent) (CW 6/14/10)
    • Centrally-located doubled dies (CW 4/15/19)
      • Rotated

Weak or incomplete hubbing (always part of a doubled die)

Tilted hubbing (always part of a doubled die)

Misaligned hubbing (uncorrected) (CW 5/30/22)

Repunched date (ES July/August 2012; CW 12/14/09)

    • 1956-D cent with repunched 5 (controversial) (CW 9/20/04, 7/16/12)
    • 1957-D cent with repunched 7 (controversial)

Re-engraved date (on master die or working die)

Blundered date (on master die or working die)

    • 1853 Half Dime with Inverted Date, Repunched with Corrected Date

Misplaced date (e.g. digits in denticles) (CW 4/21/03)

Misplaced mintmark

Phantom mintmark (working hub has mintmark incompletely removed)

    • (e.g. faint D and S mintmarks in cents from the late 1990s)

Dual mintmarks

    • 1980 D & S cent (recently delisted)
    • 1956 D & S cent (controversial)

Horizontal mintmarks (inevitably repunched)

Tilted mintmarks (punched in at an angle) (CW 7/28/14)

Rotated Mintmarks (CW 7/28/14)

Inverted mintmarks

Deeply-punched (high-standing) mintmarks (CW 9/29/14)

    • High-standing D mintmark (1987-D, 1988-D, and 1989-D cents)

Weakly-punched mintmarks

Repunched mintmarks (CW 1/20/20)

    • Overlapping mintmarks
    • Totally separated mintmarks
    • Two different fonts
    • Large over small mintmarks

Repunched mint marks on the Jefferson nickel; Book by James Wiles (downloadable version)

Overmintmarks

    • 1938-D/S Buffalo Nickel
    • 1944-D/S cent

Other repunched or re-engraved design elements

    • Denomination
    • Letters
    • Assay value
    • Other design elements

Omitted mintmarks

    • 1982 “no-P” Roosevelt dime
    • 1990 Lincoln proof cent without S-mintmark

COIN WORLD SPECIAL: article posted HERE on 1975-S Roosevelt dime without mintmark.

Omitted date (foreign only) (CW 4/28/14)

Other omitted design elements

Large over small mintmarks

Different mintmark styles and sizes

Overdates (CW 1/23/17)

    • Caused by repunching or re-engraving
      • 1892 over an 18(8)2 Peruvian 1/2 Dino
      • 1958-D Lincoln cent with repunched 7 digit (debunked)
    • Caused by second hubbing of different date (Class III doubled die)
    • Caused by grinding off earlier design and rehubbing or repunching (CW 1/23/17)
      • 1943 over 1942 Jefferson nickel

Dual Dates (earlier date faint)

    • Caused by erasing earlier date on working hub
    • Caused by removing earlier date from working die and re-hubbing (e.g. 1975 Bahamas 5c with faint date “1973” on opposite face)

Wrong dates

    • Date later than final date of issue (e.g., 1913 Liberty Head nickel)
    • Date earlier than first date of issue (e.g., 1954 Mexico 5 centavos – small size)
    • Wrong digits (e.g., 1393/1893 Peruvian peso)
    • Transposed digits

Blundered dies (various types) (CW 8/18/08)

    • Misspelling on working dies
    • 1801 Large Cent: United misspelled IINITED
    • 1863 Patriotic Token; SPOT misspelled (SPOOT)

Special Finish Errors (Proofs, Mint sets, Special Mint Sets, Satin Finish, etc.)

    • Frosting slop-over (proofs) 
    • Offset frosting (proofs) (CW 2/21/11)
    • Design removed by proof polishing (CW 2/21/11)
    • Field lowered by proof polishing (CW 2/14/11)
    • Frosting applied in wrong place (CW 2/28/11)
      • COIN WORLD SPECIAL: article posted HERE “Frosted Freedom” $50 and $100 platinum coins (CW 8/1/11)
    • Frosting omitted
    • Stencil outlines (CW 2/18/13)
    • Incomplete Proof Laser Frosting (CW 9/12/16, 9/6/21)

Design Extension Dimples (CW 4/18/11)

    • COIN WORLD SPECIAL: article posted HERE

Edge Lettering Font Variants

    • Presidential dollars (4-5 types) (CW 10/18/10)

Hidden Initials And Symbols

    • Applied to working die or master die
      • 1973 and 1974 Mexico Bronze 20 Centavos
      • 1984 Mexico 1 Peso
    • Applied to working hub
      • 2023 “extra V” cent (CW 3/27/23)


Green lettering – major heading

Blue lettering – linked to subject matter

Brown lettering – subject matter covered under that heading

Black lettering – no entry yet

Master Die Doubling

Part II. Die Varieties:

Master Die Doubling

Master die doubling resembles a minor doubled die (hub doubling), but instead of being restricted to a single working die, it appears on many working dies.  The wide distribution of identical doubling can be traced to hub doubling affecting the master die.  The master die is the template from which many working dies are generated.

When the master hub is pressed into the presumptive master die, several squeezes are required to fully transfer the images.  Any shift in position between the master hub and the master die can result in doubling.  The shift can occur between hubbings or even during a single squeeze.

This form of raised doubling is subtle and characterizes all coins produced in a particular year, and sometimes over many years.  It is produced in the initial stages of die preparation, as a large bias relief model of the design is transferred to a master hub by use of a Janvier Reduction Lathe.  This device works in basically the same way as an artist’s pantograph.  Vibration during the prolonged transfer process can result in slight duplication along the edge of the design.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Master die doubling occurred in the W of WE in 1918 on the Lincoln cent master die. This doubling created a notch on the upper left vertical of the W which lasted until 1960 (the 1960 small date Lincoln cent) when that motto was re-engraved into the master die.

The image to the left shows the word WE as seen in the year 1917 and the image to the right shows the WE as seen in the year 1918.

Another example of master die doubling was seen on the 1955 Lincoln cent. This doubling was located to the bottom left of the letters TY in LIBERTY.

The image above shows the doubling (extra vertical bars) and is indicated by white arrows.

Another great example of master die doubling occurred in 2006 with the reverse die of the Canadian nickel. The images below show the 2005 reverse die to the left and the 2006 reverse die to the right. Notice the doubling of the claws indicated by the white arrows. Since this is master die doubling, all 2006 Canadian nickels will show this doubling to some extent. The clarity of the doubling is dependent on the age/wear of the master die, working hub, or working die.

 

Die Deterioration Doubling Raised

PART IV. Die Errors:

Die Deterioration / Deformation errors: 

Die Deterioration Doubling:

Definition: Die deterioration (die wear, die fatigue) sometimes produces discernible doubling of affected design elements.  We call this die deterioration doubling (DDD).  Its appearance is highly variable.  It is often raised but can sometimes be incuse.  Incuse DDD is most often seen on copper-plated zinc cents, but does occasionally appear in other issues.  Die deterioration doubling may completely surround an affected design element (like a number or letter) or may be restricted to one side.

One of the more infamous examples of die deterioration doubling appeared in 1955 when working dies for the Lincoln cent were not replaced in a timely manner.

The doubling formed on the last digit (5) of the date and in extreme examples, the last two digits of the date (55).

The true 1955 doubled die cent neither resembles nor is related to this very common effect. However,  since it occurred in the same year as the famous doubled die cent, this common form of doubling was christened the “poor  man’s double die” and used as a space-filler for the true 1955 doubled die.  Similar doubling of the last digit can be found in Lincoln cents from 1947, 1948, and 1953.

The image below shows die deterioration doubling on a 1999-P Jefferson nickel. 

 

 

Double Die

The term DOUBLE DIE is incorrectly used at times to describe hub doubling or doubled dies. Most often, this term is seen as an expression used to describe the “poor man’s” 1955 Lincoln cent with die deterioration doubling.

 

Misaligned Hubbing (Uncorrected)

Part II. Die Varieties:

Misaligned hubbing (uncorrected)


Definition: A working die that receives an uncorrected misaligned impression
from a working hub.

Misaligned hubbings occur every so often. If the initial hubbing is misaligned, it is always corrected by a properly centered hubbing. Sometimes the offset hubbing occurs after the properly centered hubbing. In either case, the result is a Class IV doubled die (offset hub doubling).

Uncorrected misaligned hubbings are currently unknown among domestic or world coins. However, Daniel Carr has created some silver rounds that replicate the appearance of an uncorrected misaligned hubbing.

Photos courtesy of Daniel Carr.

This American Silver Eagle bullion coin was overstruck by a pair of private-issue dies that closely replicate the design of the Walking Liberty half dollar. The host coin’s design has been nearly obliterated. The obverse design was engraved directly into the obverse die in a 15% offset position.

While the result looks like a misaligned die error, there are key differences:

  1. There is no weakness on the reverse opposite the featureless obverse crescent.
  2. The obverse crescent is perfectly flat and smooth. The unstruck crescent of a misaligned strike would bulge toward the viewer, show tumbling marks or, in the case of proofs, display a pocked, burnished surface.
  3. The outer margin of the featureless crescent makes a sharp, right-angle junction with the coin’s edge. A misaligned strike would preserve the planchet’s proto-rim.
  4. The reeding is strong next to the featureless crescent. A misaligned strike would show weakness in the reeding.

Weak Hubbing

PART II. Die Varieties:

Class VIII (Tilted Hub Doubling):

Weaker Impression Hubbed Last

 

The 1963-D Lincoln cent pictured below was struck with a tilted obverse doubled die (Class VIII). Only the last digit shows doubling. The faint 3 digit may be the result of a light, accidental contact between hub and die after the final hubbing was completed.  Other explanations have been floated for this unusual doubled die.

Image courtesy of Coppercoins.

Another example of a tilted (Class VIII) obverse doubled die is seen on this 1915-D Lincoln cent. Notice the extra bar under the L of LIBERTY. Again, this could be the result of an accidental meeting of the hub and die after completion of the hubbing process.

1969, 1970, and 1970-D Dime With 1968-S Proof Reverse

Part III. Die Installation Errors:

Mismatched business / proof dies:

1969, 1970, and 1970-D dime with 1968-S proof

reverse

Definition: Subtle differences in design details can differentiate dies used in different years.  Whether accidental or purposeful, obverse dies are sometimes mated with a reverse die meant for a previous or subsequent year.  These are often called “transitional reverses”.  Well-known examples include 1992(P) and 1992-D Lincoln cent obverses mated to a 1993 reverse.


The image to the left shows the well defined flame from the torch on a 1968-S Proof reverse Roosevelt dime. The image to the right shows a less defined flame from the same torch on a 1970-D Roosevelt dime. The flame to the right was the most common reverse found on 1969, 1970 and 1970-D Roosevelt dimes. The image to the right is also a doubled die ((FS-10-1970D-802)

1969                                              1970                                                        1970-D

The three images above show the well defined flame atop the torch for the years indicated below each image. It appears that a 1968-S proof reverse was used as a business working die for some coins struck in 1969 and 1970.

Coins courtesy of John Miller.

The Mysterious 1960 Small Date Lincoln Cent




The
Mysterious 1960 Small Date Lincoln Cent


By BJ Neff, NLG

           It was a pleasant surprise to have
read the 20 November, 2006 edition of Coin World and found that
Eric von Klinger had written in his “Collectors’
Clearinghouse” column about my earlier work concerning the 1960 small date
Lincoln cents. Even at that time, I had felt that there was something a bit mysterious about the less than one year change to the obverse die and the Mint’s reasoning why the 1960 small date of the Lincoln cent was discontinued.


         In 2006, I had established that the 1960 small date Lincoln cent master
die was the first to be made, strengthening LIBERTY and IN GOD WE TRUST from
what was on the 1959 Lincoln cent obverse master die. The discontinuation
of the small date, according to the U.S. Mint, was a problem that arose with
the working dies chipping out in the smaller 0 digit of the date. To correct
this problem, the 0 digit was enlarged along with the 6 and 9 digits for
balance in the larger date 1960 cent. On the surface, this did sound like a
plausible explanation.


          We
now move forward to the year 2010 and the conception of MADdieclashes.com. This
site, which deals with the odd and unusual die clashes, was Mike
Diamond’s
 brain child but was built with equal contributions
from Jason Cuvelier, Bob Piazza, and myself. This is
where the second part of the story concerning the 1960 small date Lincoln cent
began.


         One
of the rarer types of die clash is the tilted die clash (vertically misaligned
die clash). This is where one or both dies are tilted relative to the
horizontal plane so that when the dies do meet, only peripheral design elements
are clashed into the other die’s field near the rim. We must remember that the
working dies are convex shaped, so an appreciable tilt must be present to
produce such a die clash. Imagine the action of the hammer die hitting a
planchet with a full transfer of its design onto that planchet.  Then
imagine that same die tilted to such a degree that, in the absence of a
planchet, it transfers only a small amount of its design into a small area.
With this mental picture, it’s easy to understand why the tilted die clash is
very rare.


Vertical Misaligned
Die Clash (Conventional Type)
 is the
definition we use on MADdieclashes.com to define a tilted die clash. If you
look at the entries for this particular die clash type, you will find that
there are over 100 assorted clashes under this heading. That doesn’t sound so
rare, does it? However, if they are all found on just one denomination for just
one year, that does make it a bit more interesting. Now add to the fact that mostly
all the tilted die clashes have been found on the 1960 and 1960D small date
Lincoln cents makes this story into a mystery. It would seem that, the 1960
small date Lincoln cent does indeed have an untold story.


      We should first look into the unusual
tilted die clashes found on the small date 1960 Lincoln cents. The first set of
clash marks (obverse and reverse) consists of the partial letters of ONE CENT
found protruding from Lincoln’s head.  Specifically, these clash
marks consist of the NE of ONE and the C of CENT.  On the reverse
die, a line from the top of Lincoln’s profile passes through the word ONE and
the C of CENT.



Working
clockwise, the second set of clash marks can be seen around the date and the
mint mark in this 1960-D cent. On the obverse face, a clash line
from the bottom of the letters in AMERICA can be seen from the bottom of the 6,
extending through the mint mark, and finally on to the lower portion of
Lincoln’s bust. On the reverse face, the mint mark can be clearly seen clashed
into the bottom of the ME of AMERICA. The jacket clash line as well as the
jacket fold can be seen cutting across the bottoms of the letters AM of
AMERICA.



           The
third set of clash marks are the result of STATES being clashed into the area
below the bottom of Lincoln’s bust. On the obverse face, a partial
D from UNITED, plus partial letters from the word STATES can be seen clashed
into the area below Lincoln’s bust. The reverse face shows the lower line of
Lincoln’s bust clashed through the word STATES and into the D of UNITED. In
other specimens with a similar clash, the lower back of Lincoln can be seen
clashed into the D of UNITED and into the roof / cornice of the Memorial
building.













            
There are two less commonly seen die clashes that should be mentioned as
well. The first is caused by the roof of the Memorial building being clashed
onto the obverse die in the area of the date. It is seen as a rather short
bar protruding from the front of Lincoln’s jacket and at times it does extend
into the first digit of the date.






The other die clash pattern is created by the lower
back of Lincoln’s bust as it passes through either the D or E of UNITED. There
are just a few of these dies that show the partial letter D on the obverse die
and only one instance where the jacket line can be seen in bay 3 of the
Memorial building.












         
The other die clash pattern is created by the lower back of Lincoln’s bust as
it passes through either the D or E of UNITED. There are just a few of these
dies that show the partial letter D on the obverse die and only one instance
where the jacket line can be seen in bay 3 of the Memorial building.


           It
is peculiar that having examined over 9000 small date 1960 Lincoln cents
from both mints, that only a few had the commonly seen  die clash of the Lincoln cents. Mostly all
the die clashes are located well away from the center on both die faces. For those
of you who are not familiar with the common Lincoln cent die clash, please
refer to the picture below.













              Now
that we have a concept of what is occurring with the die clashes, let us take
a look at a few more odd facts. Pick up any small date 1960 Lincoln cents and
the one feature that will be noted is the abundant die scratches, especially
in the areas where the clash marks can be frequently found. Presently, we
have listed 35 separate dies on MADdieclashes.com that have had clash events,
some having evidence of more than one clash event affecting that single die.
I have approximately 15 more dies to be added to the site on my desk, and I
am still searching rolls of 1960 small dates. If we look at the Memorial
Lincoln cent series, beginning with its start in the year 1959 and during any
of the next ten years, we will not find a single year with that many
different die clashes. Even in the early 1980’s, with the large amount of die
clashes found during that period that amount pales in comparison to what was
found on the 1960 small date        


              Another odd fact is that you can find coins struck with conflicting dies. A
conflicting die is one that will show clash marks from the opposing die,
while the opposing die is free of them. For example, a coin will have the
partial letters of STATES clashed under Lincoln’s bust on the obverse die but
does not show the corresponding clash mark of the lower bust line through the
word STATES. This can be explained by the removal of one or both dies after a
clash event, subsequent abrasion to remove the clash marks and then a failure
to put both back into service as a mated pair.


            The
current practice of the U. S. Mint seems to involve replacing the obverse die
after anything more than minor clash, while abrading the reverse die. But
there is no period of time where both the obverse and reverse dies were
heavily abraded and kept in service.


               The
next step is to go back and revisit the stories from the U. S. Mint
concerning the small date 1960 Lincoln cents. When the small date was first
noticed by coin collectors, the mint director, W. H. Brett, denied that any
changes had taken place. It was later that the Mint corrected that statement
and admitted that both a small date and large date 1960 Lincoln cent were in
circulation. As I had mentioned in the beginning of this article, the Mint
stated that the change was necessary to correct a problem with the small 0 in
the date chipping out. The 0 in the date was made larger, along with the 6
and 9 digit to balance the proportions of all the digits. In his 2006
column, Eric von Klinger had mentioned that I believed that
the 9 digit was actually an inverted 6 digit which was punched into the
master die. Since that time we have found that the digits in the date were
actually engraved into the master die and not applied through a punch.


          
  After looking at the 9000+ small date cents from the year 1960, I
found none with a chipped out 0 digits — the supposed problem that ceased
its production! Yes, there were a few dies with chipped out 6 digits and more
dies with chipping in the R of LIBERTY. However, that is not the area that
the Mint had stated was the problem. So, exactly what was the malfunction
with the 1960 small date Lincoln cent?


             While
we will never know exactly what did happen at the U. S. Mint  to
make it  abandon the use of the small date on the 1960 Lincoln
cent, but let us look at what we do know. The 1960 small date cent master die
was made sometime in 1959, from which was then made the various working hubs
and working dies. After the working dies were completed, the Denver mint mark
was applied to the allotted amount for service to that mint. The production
began in the beginning of the year with the Denver mint making the first of
that year’s Lincoln cent a coin press. There are two  obvious facts
that the small date Lincoln cent was odd; first, the location of the die
clash marks seen where they had never been seen before and the frequency of
the die clashes that did occur on the small date cents.


            Let’s
examine the first fact. With the majority of the die clash events being the
tilted die clash variety (the reason I say majority is that I am sure one or
two will be found with a die clash marks found in the center of the die), the
hammer die may have had a different mounting system in the coin press than
seen in previous years. This tilting of the hammer die could have been a
designed feature to lessen the impact of the dies when they did clash, which
in turn would reduce the number of the obverse dies discarded after a
clash.  Alternatively, it may have been just an unusual effect of
the way the hammer die was mounted in the coin press.


           The
second fact points to a problem in the planchet delivery system. With the
extremely large number of clash die events occurring with the small date Lincoln
cent, it did indicate there was a problem. With each clash event, the coin
press would have to be stopped, the dies examined for damage and then either
replaced or abraded to remove the clash marks. Exactly why this problem did
occur cannot be pinpointed. However, this problem may have doomed the small
date Lincoln cent. But why make another complete set of new working dies from
scratch?


          We
know that the large date and small date working hubs for 1960 were the same
physical shape. This is evident in the four working dies (3 proof dies and
one Denver mint die) that were hubbed with both a small and large working
hubs (Class III doubled dies). After the master die had completed the working
hubs and the working hubs the working dies of the small date 1960 Lincoln
cent, it may have been deemed that the master die and working hubs were too
worn to produce working dies. This would necessitate the making of a new
master die, working hubs and working dies. But why switch to the large date
version of the Lincoln cent in that same year, which duplicated the work that
had previously been accomplished on the small date Lincoln cent? Was there
some other factor that made the small date Lincoln cent uniquely different
that the previously manufactured working dies for that version of the Lincoln
cent were unusable? Again, we can only guess what that difference may have
been, but surely it was not because the digits in the date were chipping out
as the mint stated.


         Another
odd phenomenon has been observed in connection with both versions of the 1960
Lincoln cent. In the making of the master die for the year, the previous
year’s master hub (or a preceding year’s master hub) was employed to make
that new master die by abrading the last two digits (in some cases the last
three digits) of the date from that master hub. The new master die was made
and the last two digits were engraved into the newly formed die.











          However, it appears
that the small date 1960 master die was made from a previous year’s master
hub that had all design elements removed except for Lincoln’s bust. This is
also true for the large date 1960 Lincoln cent as well. If we compare the
word LIBERTY in a 1959 cent to the same word in both the 1960 small date
and large date cent, we can see obvious differences in the lettering.
Look at the picture to the right and while the word LIBERTY does appear to be
the same in all three examples, closer scrutiny reveals a difference in just
about all the letters.







We can also see similar differences
in the motto IN GOD WE TRUST pictured below from the two dates and the large
and small date 1960 cent.



         Why did the mint
go to the extra effort of making a new master die without LIBERTY and IN GOD WE
TRUST only to have those two design elements reengraved into that new master die?
We can see that the motto had not yet migrated to the edge of the die for the
positioning of LIBERTY and IN GOD WE TRUST appear the same for 1959, 1960 small
date and 1960 large date. It has been noted by both James Wiles and me that the
1960 large date master hub was used without change up until the year of change
in 1969. In 1968, the master hub from its continuous use to make master dies
had spread Lincoln’s bust outward to a point that the motto had merged with the
rim. But that does not explain the mint’s actions in 1960 and still leaves us
wanting a better understanding of just what went on at the mint in that year.
Could this have been a situation similar to what the mint experienced with the
web note
[1]?


        We
now have a somewhat clearer picture of what may have happened in 1960 to the
Lincoln cent. Of course this information is all based on conjecture. Would the
Mint tell the real story? I am not too sure that they would since they did not
readily admit to the small date / large date change at the time, and then they
provided some misinformation concerning the reason for that change.


         So,
the next time that you are searching those small date Lincoln cent rolls from
the Denver mint looking for RPM’s, also look for those unique die clashes. You
may be presently surprised at what you can find.







[1] The
web note was printed on a high speed printing press that did not live up to the
expectations of the Mint. The one dollar bill was the only limited note printed
on this press type.


Push Doubling

PART VI. Striking Errors:

Machine Doubling:

Push Doubling:


Definition:
 
Push doubling occurs when a die bounces off the surface of the coin, shifts position, and lands lightly in a different spot.  A diagnostic feature is marginal shelving at the edges of design elements.  Interior features often show rounded doubling that is easily mistaken for the effects of a double strike or a doubled die.  Push doubling can occur on either face, although its most dramatic expressions tend to appear on the face struck by the hammer die. Cases of push doubling can involve up to three closely-spaced sets of accessory design elements.  Push doubling can occur on both faces simultaneously and often in different directions.  Up to three different doubling directions can be represented on a single face.

Forms of machine doubling combining elements of both push doubling and slide doubling do occur.

Classic machine doubling can be seen on this 1991 Lincoln cent.  The doubling occurs on both faces.  The obverse face shows doubling in three different directions — east-to-west, south-to-north, and north-to-south.

Below is a 1989 Lincoln cent with push doubling. The light green areas show where the die rebounded off of the date and pushed it down; the resulting illustration shows the doubled areas removed to demonstrate how the device is thinned down (or missing). The final illustration is a close up showing how the doubling is flat or shelf like.

Push doubling is often naked eye obvious, this is due to the way the rebounded areas have cut into the metal and often have a different, shinier surface that will catch the light differently. New collectors will often mistake common push doubling as being a doubled die or a in collar rotated double strike.

A doubled die is an additive process where the hub has left multiple impressions of a device, this will result in rounded doubled areas and make the device larger. Doubled dies most often have notching which is where the sharp corners of the doubled areas overlap; machine doubling cannot do this.

Below is a close up of a Lincoln cent with push doubling and below that a close up of 1983 DDR-001 with rounded doubling. The push doubling shows a marginal doubling that is flat, uneven and cuts into the device. The doubled die shows the O of cent with an additional part of  the same O, incomplete and adjacent. While the more lightly hubbed O is incomplete, the first hubbed O was not.

The illustration first shows shows a in collar rotated double strike on a token where the black arrows show the first strike of CA, subsequently flattened, the hammer die retracted then struck a second time and the red arrows show the CA from from that strike. The red arrows show areas from the first strike that were not impacted from the second. At the bottom is push doubling where the green arrows show the RTY and then the violet arrows where die rebounded and flattened part of the devices.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 5
  • Next Page »
  • Home
  • Introduction To This Website
  • Error-ref.com News
  • Comprehensive Error-Variety Checklist
  • Index Of Completed Entries
  • Part I. Die Subtypes:
  • Part II. Die Varieties:
  • Part III. Die Installation Errors:
  • Part IV. Die Errors:
  • Part V. Planchet Errors:
  • Part VI. Striking Errors:
  • Part VII. Post-Strike Mint Modifications:
  • Part VIII. Post-Strike Striking Chamber Mishaps:
  • Part IX. Post-Strike Mint Damage:
  • Part X. Wastebasket / Composite Categories:
  • Part XI. Non Errors:
  • Featured Articles Of Interested
  • Interest & Not So Interesting Facts
  • Other Sites And Forums Of Interest
  • Our Thanks Go To
  • About The Authors
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025